Home
News
In Focus
Business
Metro
Nation
World
Sports
Feature
Opinion
View more »Opinion Columns
Wan LixinOpinion deputy editor of Shanghai Daily
Restaurants get off to a quick start thanks to game-changing policies
High service charges on event ticket refunds call for further regulation
Sunday
- Subscribe
Related News
Clash between House and SEC in Madoff scam
By Marcy Gordon |
February 6, 2009, Friday
|
Print Edition
Print Edition
UNITED States House law makers on Wednesday accused the Securities and Exchange Commission of impeding their probe into how the agency failed to uncover the alleged US$50 billion fraud perpetrated by Bernard Madoff.
The clash between law makers and high-ranking SEC officials came at a hearing after the whistleblower, Harry Markopolos, said he had feared for his physical safety and would turn over new evidence to the agency showing Madoff had not acted alone.
Markopolos said he had discovered a dozen additional funds that funneled money to Madoff, "hiding in the weeds" in Europe. Managers of investment "feeder" funds that relayed money to Madoff willfully turned a blind eye to his improprieties because they were paid generous fees, Markopolos said.
He was due to present his findings to the SEC's inspector general yesterday. If proven, they would substantiate the assertions of many analysts that the alleged fraud was far too large for Madoff to have conducted alone.
Madoff, a prominent Wall Street figure who had been chairman of the Nasdaq Stock Market, was arrested in December after allegedly confessing to his sons that he had bilked investors in what the authorities say may be the largest Ponzi scheme ever.
Markopolos also planned to provide information on what he called a "mini-Madoff," another Ponzi scheme he said he's uncovered that may have defrauded investors of as much as US$1 billion.
In loud, angry exchanges, law makers threatened to issue subpoenas to SEC officials to compel their testimony.
Republican Paul Kanjorski, the House Financial Services subcommittee's chairman, vented frustration after the SEC's acting general counsel said the five officials appearing before the panel couldn't answer law makers' questions about the Madoff case because it's under probe. The five SEC commissioners voted earlier to assert a privilege in not having officials answer questions from Congress.
Kanjorski accused the agency of impeding the panel's investigation, calling it an "abuse of authority."
It was a blistering escalation of criticism of the SEC, which has been blasted by lawmakers and investor advocates over its failure to discover Madoff's alleged US$50 billion Ponzi scheme.
The clash between law makers and high-ranking SEC officials came at a hearing after the whistleblower, Harry Markopolos, said he had feared for his physical safety and would turn over new evidence to the agency showing Madoff had not acted alone.
Markopolos said he had discovered a dozen additional funds that funneled money to Madoff, "hiding in the weeds" in Europe. Managers of investment "feeder" funds that relayed money to Madoff willfully turned a blind eye to his improprieties because they were paid generous fees, Markopolos said.
He was due to present his findings to the SEC's inspector general yesterday. If proven, they would substantiate the assertions of many analysts that the alleged fraud was far too large for Madoff to have conducted alone.
Madoff, a prominent Wall Street figure who had been chairman of the Nasdaq Stock Market, was arrested in December after allegedly confessing to his sons that he had bilked investors in what the authorities say may be the largest Ponzi scheme ever.
Markopolos also planned to provide information on what he called a "mini-Madoff," another Ponzi scheme he said he's uncovered that may have defrauded investors of as much as US$1 billion.
In loud, angry exchanges, law makers threatened to issue subpoenas to SEC officials to compel their testimony.
Republican Paul Kanjorski, the House Financial Services subcommittee's chairman, vented frustration after the SEC's acting general counsel said the five officials appearing before the panel couldn't answer law makers' questions about the Madoff case because it's under probe. The five SEC commissioners voted earlier to assert a privilege in not having officials answer questions from Congress.
Kanjorski accused the agency of impeding the panel's investigation, calling it an "abuse of authority."
It was a blistering escalation of criticism of the SEC, which has been blasted by lawmakers and investor advocates over its failure to discover Madoff's alleged US$50 billion Ponzi scheme.
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 沪ICP证：沪ICP备05050403号-1
- |
- 互联网新闻信息服务许可证：31120180004
- |
- 网络视听许可证：0909346
- |
- 广播电视节目制作许可证：沪字第354号
- |
- 增值电信业务经营许可证：沪B2-20120012
Copyright © 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
