Related News
Moody鈥檚 report slammed as 鈥榮hoddy鈥
Print Edition
HONG Kong’s securities regulator yesterday said a Moody’s report questioning corporate governance at 49 Chinese firms was “shoddy” and “unprofessional” — a report the ratings agency said it stood by even though it contained errors.
The Securities and Futures Commission, citing internal Moody’s e-mails, said articles critical of Chinese companies by international newspapers and research firms had prompted Moody’s to “scrub” the list of Chinese companies whose credit it rated.
Credit ratings help determine a firm’s cost of borrowing and are used by fund managers to guide investment decisions.
“The work was shoddy, unprofessional and done in the manner that really doesn’t befit a reputable rating agency that is being regulated,” SFC counsel Ben Yu said at a hearing in the securities and futures appeals tribunal for Moody’s appeal of a US$3 million penalty.
Moody’s said there were some errors in its so-called red flags report in July 2011 and that they were not serious enough to warrant a HK$6 million (US$774,213) fine — part of the penalty by the SFC, which said the mistakes were a serious breach of due diligence standards.
Moody’s counsel, Adrian Huggins, told the tribunal: “Those errors did not render the whole red flags framework fundamentally flawed.”
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 娌狪CP璇侊細娌狪CP澶05050403鍙-1
- |
- 浜掕仈缃戞柊闂讳俊鎭湇鍔¤鍙瘉锛31120180004
- |
- 缃戠粶瑙嗗惉璁稿彲璇侊細0909346
- |
- 骞挎挱鐢佃鑺傜洰鍒朵綔璁稿彲璇侊細娌瓧绗354鍙
- |
- 澧炲肩數淇′笟鍔＄粡钀ヨ鍙瘉锛氭勃B2-20120012
Copyright 漏 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
