Review of UK banks should be 'radical'
By Raphael G. Satter |
August 3, 2009, Monday
|
Print Edition
Print Edition
A GOVERNMENT-COMMISSIONED review of the British banking industry should be more radical regarding issues such as shareholder rights and transparency, a United Kingdom minister said last Saturday.
Treasury Minister Paul Myners said the review of the nation's banks being conducted by former regulator David Walker should consider whether to reward long-term investors with better voting rights and force banks' top earners to disclose their salaries.
"I would like to see David Walker step one step further outside the box of thinking he is currently in and see what are the more radical, indeed the most radical, solutions," Myners told the BBC's "Leading Questions" program.
An interim version of Walker's report, which is due out in November, has already recommended strengthening oversight by boosting the role of non-executives in the risk and payment process.
Myners said the final report could include recommendations such as barring investors who hold shares for less than six months from voting at annual general meetings. This would be to encourage shareholders to think of themselves as stakeholders as opposed to traders who jump in and out of firms "willy-nilly."
"We've lost sight of the fact that a share certificate ... is a right and entitlement of ownership which carries with it certain responsibilities," he said. "There is a weakness in an absence of proper engagement and stewardship by the shareholder, as far as the company is concerned."
Myners also said he was interested in a United States-style disclosure system in which banks have to publish the pay packages of their five highest-earning employees, though he said this could be extended to cover 10 or 20 people in British institutions.
The finance industry reacted coolly to Myners' suggestions.
Peter Montagnon, the director of investment affairs at the Association of British Insurers, said he recognized the problem of shareholder responsibility, but creating different classes of shareholder may have implications.
"If you discriminate between the kinds of shareholders you have got, that is not good for confidence in the market," he told BBC radio's "Today" program.
The British Bankers' Association said there were "strong risks involved in complete transparency."
Treasury Minister Paul Myners said the review of the nation's banks being conducted by former regulator David Walker should consider whether to reward long-term investors with better voting rights and force banks' top earners to disclose their salaries.
"I would like to see David Walker step one step further outside the box of thinking he is currently in and see what are the more radical, indeed the most radical, solutions," Myners told the BBC's "Leading Questions" program.
An interim version of Walker's report, which is due out in November, has already recommended strengthening oversight by boosting the role of non-executives in the risk and payment process.
Myners said the final report could include recommendations such as barring investors who hold shares for less than six months from voting at annual general meetings. This would be to encourage shareholders to think of themselves as stakeholders as opposed to traders who jump in and out of firms "willy-nilly."
"We've lost sight of the fact that a share certificate ... is a right and entitlement of ownership which carries with it certain responsibilities," he said. "There is a weakness in an absence of proper engagement and stewardship by the shareholder, as far as the company is concerned."
Myners also said he was interested in a United States-style disclosure system in which banks have to publish the pay packages of their five highest-earning employees, though he said this could be extended to cover 10 or 20 people in British institutions.
The finance industry reacted coolly to Myners' suggestions.
Peter Montagnon, the director of investment affairs at the Association of British Insurers, said he recognized the problem of shareholder responsibility, but creating different classes of shareholder may have implications.
"If you discriminate between the kinds of shareholders you have got, that is not good for confidence in the market," he told BBC radio's "Today" program.
The British Bankers' Association said there were "strong risks involved in complete transparency."
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 沪ICP证：沪ICP备05050403号-1
- |
- 互联网新闻信息服务许可证：31120180004
- |
- 网络视听许可证：0909346
- |
- 广播电视节目制作许可证：沪字第354号
- |
- 增值电信业务经营许可证：沪B2-20120012
Copyright © 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
