Sneakers firm digs in heels over name
By Zhao Wen |
November 16, 2011, Wednesday
|
Print Edition
Print Edition
SNEAKERS manufacturer New Balance has taken two Chinese companies to court over an alleged trademark infringement.
The US-based sportswear manufacturer claims they used a trademark similar to its "N" design and that one of the companies had a brand name that sounds similar to "New Balance," the Huangpu District People's Court said yesterday.
New Balance said it registered the trademark in China in 1983, with N representing the capital letter of the company's name and a major part of its unique trademark pattern.
It sued the Niubanlun Sportswear Company from Quanzhou, Fujian Province, for using a similar trademark and claimed Niubanlun had produced and sold counterfeit shoes around the country since 2007.
New Balance also sued Shanghai Tibo Business Consulting Company, claiming Tibo was involved in selling counterfeit New Balance shoes produced by Niubanlun in Shanghai's Qingpu District and Pudong New Area.
In court, Niubanlun said its trademark was legally registered.
But New Balance claimed the trademark Niubanlun had registered should not be used on sports shoes.
The two parties also argued over the Chinese brand name in the court.
New Balance claimed Niubanlun used its former Chinese brand name that had been widely known on the Chinese market since 1995.
While New Balance started using a new Chinese brand name in 2003, it still used the former name on packaging in China until 2006.
But Niubanlun said the Chinese brand name was not registered by New Balance and could be used without infringement risk.
Under the suit, New Balance asked the two companies to stop infringing its trademark and the former Chinese brand name of New Balance.
It also asked them to destroy counterfeit products and stop selling them, demanding compensation of 500,000 yuan (US$ 78,721).
The court did not announce a verdict yesterday.
The US-based sportswear manufacturer claims they used a trademark similar to its "N" design and that one of the companies had a brand name that sounds similar to "New Balance," the Huangpu District People's Court said yesterday.
New Balance said it registered the trademark in China in 1983, with N representing the capital letter of the company's name and a major part of its unique trademark pattern.
It sued the Niubanlun Sportswear Company from Quanzhou, Fujian Province, for using a similar trademark and claimed Niubanlun had produced and sold counterfeit shoes around the country since 2007.
New Balance also sued Shanghai Tibo Business Consulting Company, claiming Tibo was involved in selling counterfeit New Balance shoes produced by Niubanlun in Shanghai's Qingpu District and Pudong New Area.
In court, Niubanlun said its trademark was legally registered.
But New Balance claimed the trademark Niubanlun had registered should not be used on sports shoes.
The two parties also argued over the Chinese brand name in the court.
New Balance claimed Niubanlun used its former Chinese brand name that had been widely known on the Chinese market since 1995.
While New Balance started using a new Chinese brand name in 2003, it still used the former name on packaging in China until 2006.
But Niubanlun said the Chinese brand name was not registered by New Balance and could be used without infringement risk.
Under the suit, New Balance asked the two companies to stop infringing its trademark and the former Chinese brand name of New Balance.
It also asked them to destroy counterfeit products and stop selling them, demanding compensation of 500,000 yuan (US$ 78,721).
The court did not announce a verdict yesterday.
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 娌狪CP璇侊細娌狪CP澶05050403鍙-1
- |
- 浜掕仈缃戞柊闂讳俊鎭湇鍔¤鍙瘉锛31120180004
- |
- 缃戠粶瑙嗗惉璁稿彲璇侊細0909346
- |
- 骞挎挱鐢佃鑺傜洰鍒朵綔璁稿彲璇侊細娌瓧绗354鍙
- |
- 澧炲肩數淇′笟鍔＄粡钀ヨ鍙瘉锛氭勃B2-20120012
Copyright 漏 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
