Car restrictions infringe on property rights
Print Edition
THE abrupt car purchase restriction announced in Shenzhen yesterday left many residents startled in the southern metropolis.
Late in the afternoon, Shenzhen authorities suddenly and unexpectedly announced a restriction requiring prospective cars buyers to acquire license plates by lottery or auction.
It led to desperate attempts to buy cars but many failed as traffic police and law enforcement had preempted the situation and forced auto stores to close shop.
Shenzhen, which borders Hong Kong, is the eighth Chinese city to issue car restrictions after Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Tianjin, Guiyang, Shijiazhuang and Hangzhou to tackle rising congestion and pollution.
Chinese people are no strangers to car buying restrictions and traffic controls. During the 2008 Olympics, Beijing introduced a daily ban on half of the city’s cars, determining who could drive on what day based on the license plates ending in odd or even numbers. The capital later relaxed the rule by keeping cars off the road one out of five weekdays and restricted car purchases.
Other major cities including Chengdu followed suit. Jinan said it would impose “temporary” bans depending on PM 2.5 density.
However, it should be noted that under such bans, property rights have been infringed upon, as cars in the capital cannot be used four days a month, which prompts more car purchases and could further damage the environment.
Such measures are controversial, but facing the capital’s overloaded roads and choking smog, authorities are still reconsidering the rule allowing cars to drive on alternate days based on license plate numbers.
The purpose of the country’s legislative body is to rationally approach a topic with consideration to various parties’ interests. Balance should be sought between people’s rights to vehicles and their demands for clean air and free traffic flow.
Traffic bans should proceed through legal channels, as was stressed by the Communist Party of China Central Committee, which says the government must run under the rule of law; powers should execute within the law; any official move should be endorsed by law.
While discussing draft revisions to the Air Pollution Law at last week’s national legislative session, lawmakers harshly criticized an article attempting to pave the legal foundation for the current administrative car ban. They proposed deleting or changing sections of the article, which would give local governments the right to issue bans. Even if it remains in the law, compensation for infringed rights should be clarified.
In reality, the current law allows temporary traffic bans for “special occasions” including events, emergencies or poor weather. The current law is respectful of people’s rights, but making the temporary administrative order a routine practice would overly restrict rights to property and the road.
The government should prefer economic measures to bans in combating air pollution, such as raising emission standards and increasing the cost of car use through parking fees.
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 沪ICP证：沪ICP备05050403号-1
- |
- 互联网新闻信息服务许可证：31120180004
- |
- 网络视听许可证：0909346
- |
- 广播电视节目制作许可证：沪字第354号
- |
- 增值电信业务经营许可证：沪B2-20120012
Copyright © 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
