For sake of school, a cramped room will do
Print Edition
DOWN a ramshackle alleyway, with no running water or toilet, and filled with rubbish, lies a cramped 13 square meter room few wealthy Chinese would deign to occupy. It is for sale at nearly US$600,000.
The space has one particular feature that makes it a spectacularly desirable residence: ownership entitles the buyer’s child to a place at the nearby Huangchenggen Primary School, considered one of the best in the People’s Republic.
The asking price of 3.8 million yuan is equivalent to US$45,000 per square meter — comparable to some properties in Mediterranean tax haven Monaco. Even so, “it’s going to move quickly,” said an estate agent showing the space, adding he had already sold two adjacent rooms.
Chinese parents are renowned for the high value they put on education, but the astronomical prices the rich are willing to pay to ensure their children get into the best schools have raised a furore over equality of opportunity.
The room’s price is more than the cost of sending a student to Harvard for both an undergraduate degree and law school.
The phenomenon is the natural outcome of a system that “emphasizes that children must win from the starting line,” said Tao Hongkai, director of an education research centre at Central China Normal University.
Parents are “investing two-thirds of their income in their child’s education,” he said, adding that “since they only have one child, they put everything into them.”
Only owning guarantees a spot at the exclusive schools, not renting, so that the best schools are increasingly reserved for China’s wealthy.
“Before, educational resources were relatively balanced. Now, it’s completely education for aristocrats,” said Tao.
Reports that a buyer paid 5.3 million yuan for an 11.4 square meter room in Wenchang Alley, with similar access privileges at Beijing Number Two Experimental Primary School, ignited controversy last week.
The schools’ catchment areas, where property-owning families with Beijing residency are guaranteed a free place, are restricted to only a few streets, with other hopefuls having to apply — and pay — for one of the coveted slots.
Beijing Number Two takes in around 800 children a year, many of whose parents are government officials. As is common in the capital’s central neighborhoods, many of the centuries-old courtyard dwellings have been chopped into a dozen or more small rooms.
Red doors with lion head knockers open into a maze of narrow junk-filled passageways, crisscrossed by ropes heavy with drying laundry, sausages, or dead ducks.
As many as three generations crowd into the tiny spaces, using nearby public bathrooms.
Even so eager buyers plaster the courtyards’ walls with fliers, desperate for rooms as small as 7 square meters.
Any space will do, said one ad, offering to pay cash for an “appropriate” accommodation. “Of course, it’s better if it’s livable,” it added.
“You could fit a bed and a dresser in it, but then you wouldn’t have space to move,” one man said. “It’s insane.”
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 娌狪CP璇侊細娌狪CP澶05050403鍙-1
- |
- 浜掕仈缃戞柊闂讳俊鎭湇鍔¤鍙瘉锛31120180004
- |
- 缃戠粶瑙嗗惉璁稿彲璇侊細0909346
- |
- 骞挎挱鐢佃鑺傜洰鍒朵綔璁稿彲璇侊細娌瓧绗354鍙
- |
- 澧炲肩數淇′笟鍔＄粡钀ヨ鍙瘉锛氭勃B2-20120012
Copyright 漏 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
