Related News
University fuels debate on work popular online
Print Edition
A UNIVERSITY in east China has sparked controversy with a rule to rate the work of students and teachers as academic achievements if they receive a high click-rate in online media.
Works published by major media outlets 鈥 the People鈥檚 Daily, Guangming Daily and Qiushi Journal 鈥 may be recognized as equal to publications in authoritative domestic journals if they are viewed as influential, according to Zhejiang University.
Work picked up by major commercial portals such as Sina, Sohu and Netease, and major publications at Xinhua news agency and China Central Television as well as on mobile apps and social media accounts, such as WeChat and Weibo, are also equal to publication in key journals if they result in significant influence, the university has decided.
It also says that the work should be transmitted by no less than 10 mainstream media outlets and have more than 100,000 page views if it is on WeChat.
鈥淓xcellent Internet cultural achievements,鈥 including original articles, video and animation works, are among academic requirements for promotion or prizes.
However, the rule, which took effect last month, has fueled debate over its feasibility and the extent to which it may devalue academic work.
Viewing the move as an exploration of academic evaluation, the university said outstanding online work would be recognized by a committee of experts in June each year.
鈥淕iven the trend of media convergence, a number of professional scholars, institutions and government departments are more willing to publish their academic works through new media first,鈥 said Zhu Wei, a communication researcher at the China University of Political Science and Law.
The academic value and influence of some online works far exceeds those of core journals, Zhu said.
Zhu Haijiu of Zhejiang Gongshang University also supported the move.
鈥淚n the era of the Internet, only recognizing publications in journals as academic output, is like only recognizing work done with brushes in the era of the pen,鈥 Zhu Haijiu said.
But others expressed their misgivings.
鈥淭here may be some problems with the current promotion and evaluation system, but academic value should not rely on the number of clicks,鈥 said Yin Jun, a teacher at Shenzhen University in south China鈥檚 Guangdong Province.
鈥淧apers have strict evaluation procedures, but it is hard to assess articles published on public media,鈥 said Zhejiang University teacher.
The university is not the only school to explore the evaluation of online work.
Shanghai Jiao Tong University has piloted a rule that excellent Internet works can be a qualification for the promotion of certain officials. Jilin University also adopted a rule encouraging the creation of online work.
In 2013, the Ministry of Education proposed a regulation on the absorption of excellent online work when calculating academic results. This year, it said it would advance the regulation.
鈥淚 am happy to see such an innovative measure, but I hope supervision covers the publication platforms during implementation to ensure fairness,鈥 said one web user.
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 娌狪CP璇侊細娌狪CP澶05050403鍙-1
- |
- 浜掕仈缃戞柊闂讳俊鎭湇鍔¤鍙瘉锛31120180004
- |
- 缃戠粶瑙嗗惉璁稿彲璇侊細0909346
- |
- 骞挎挱鐢佃鑺傜洰鍒朵綔璁稿彲璇侊細娌瓧绗354鍙
- |
- 澧炲肩數淇′笟鍔＄粡钀ヨ鍙瘉锛氭勃B2-20120012
Copyright 漏 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
