Home » Opinion » China Knowledge
Lagarde: Big struggle to make IMF relevant
April 13, 2012, Friday
|
Print Edition
Print Edition
CHRISTINE Lagarde, managing director of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), says that IMF reforms will shift 6 percent of current quotas to dynamic emerging and developing countries.
Lagarde's comments came in a recent exclusive interview with Knowledge@Wharton and media partner ParisTech Review, as BRIC countries demanded more voting power in return for the larger financial contributions being requested by the IMF.
An edited transcript of the interview appears below.
Q: How can the IMF build more credibility and quality?
A: Credibility is a matter of being representative of the institution, and that is a factor of our quota allocation, a factor of our governance.
Does the executive board actually reflect the membership? We have to represent our membership and we have to look like our membership. That calls for diversity of the staff in terms of gender, geographical origin, ways of thinking and cultural background. That can help build credibility.
Quality is not a subset, but it's closely linked to the issue of diversity. The IMF must have the ability to bring together people with different backgrounds, from different regions of the world to confront issues. I think that's a big test of the relevance of the institution.
Q: Historically the IMF has been dominated by the industrialized Western countries. How do you see the role of the BRIC nations, especially China and India, in the IMF?
A: Their role is significantly evolving. It reflects, as I was telling you for the credibility issue, the economic evolution of those countries.
It is best manifested in three areas. One is the staff. How many staff do we have in the institution who come from India or from China?
This applies throughout the institution but also at the top level. How many people in the management originate from China or India?
We have quite a number of them. I've just recently appointed the Secretary of the Board, who is a Chinese national. One of my deputy managing directors is a Chinese national. Among the key leaders of this institution, we have many very talented Indian economists who lead key departments like the strategic department. So, that's one level.
Then you have a second level, which is quota and voice. That is an evolving phenomenon, because we are right in the middle of the quota reform, which is going to shift 6 percent of current quota to dynamic emerging market and developing countries, while protecting the quota shares and voting power of the poorest members.
Clearly, the BRICs will be among the recipients of these additional quotas, and as a result of the reform, all of them will be within the top 10 countries of this institution in terms of quotas.
The third level, which I don't think is as relevant but it matters, is whether they sit at the board of the institution. As it happens, they do. Brazil sits at the table, Russia sits at the table, India sits at the table. China does as well.
Q: What role could the IMF play in bringing about a better balance between rates of exchange, for example, for a possible re-valuation of the yuan versus the US dollar and the euro?
A: It's funny that you would focus exclusively on these currencies, because our job is to assess the appropriate exchange rate - and to actually say what we think of it - for all 187 members of the institution.
We do that through appropriate modeling, gathering of data and comparing and taking into account multiple data, including the current account. It's a daunting task because we don't make anybody happy. Everybody sees himself either higher or lower and our assessment is not necessarily always welcome or well-received.
But we do it on the basis of what we know, what we observe, what we can compile and model. We are in the process of refining and updating our methodology. Probably later in 2012, we'll be able to come up with a new methodology and model of assessing exchange rates.
Adapted from Knowledge@Wharton, http://www.knowledgeatwharton.com. To read the original, please visit: http://bit.ly/Hi70Qj
Lagarde's comments came in a recent exclusive interview with Knowledge@Wharton and media partner ParisTech Review, as BRIC countries demanded more voting power in return for the larger financial contributions being requested by the IMF.
An edited transcript of the interview appears below.
Q: How can the IMF build more credibility and quality?
A: Credibility is a matter of being representative of the institution, and that is a factor of our quota allocation, a factor of our governance.
Does the executive board actually reflect the membership? We have to represent our membership and we have to look like our membership. That calls for diversity of the staff in terms of gender, geographical origin, ways of thinking and cultural background. That can help build credibility.
Quality is not a subset, but it's closely linked to the issue of diversity. The IMF must have the ability to bring together people with different backgrounds, from different regions of the world to confront issues. I think that's a big test of the relevance of the institution.
Q: Historically the IMF has been dominated by the industrialized Western countries. How do you see the role of the BRIC nations, especially China and India, in the IMF?
A: Their role is significantly evolving. It reflects, as I was telling you for the credibility issue, the economic evolution of those countries.
It is best manifested in three areas. One is the staff. How many staff do we have in the institution who come from India or from China?
This applies throughout the institution but also at the top level. How many people in the management originate from China or India?
We have quite a number of them. I've just recently appointed the Secretary of the Board, who is a Chinese national. One of my deputy managing directors is a Chinese national. Among the key leaders of this institution, we have many very talented Indian economists who lead key departments like the strategic department. So, that's one level.
Then you have a second level, which is quota and voice. That is an evolving phenomenon, because we are right in the middle of the quota reform, which is going to shift 6 percent of current quota to dynamic emerging market and developing countries, while protecting the quota shares and voting power of the poorest members.
Clearly, the BRICs will be among the recipients of these additional quotas, and as a result of the reform, all of them will be within the top 10 countries of this institution in terms of quotas.
The third level, which I don't think is as relevant but it matters, is whether they sit at the board of the institution. As it happens, they do. Brazil sits at the table, Russia sits at the table, India sits at the table. China does as well.
Q: What role could the IMF play in bringing about a better balance between rates of exchange, for example, for a possible re-valuation of the yuan versus the US dollar and the euro?
A: It's funny that you would focus exclusively on these currencies, because our job is to assess the appropriate exchange rate - and to actually say what we think of it - for all 187 members of the institution.
We do that through appropriate modeling, gathering of data and comparing and taking into account multiple data, including the current account. It's a daunting task because we don't make anybody happy. Everybody sees himself either higher or lower and our assessment is not necessarily always welcome or well-received.
But we do it on the basis of what we know, what we observe, what we can compile and model. We are in the process of refining and updating our methodology. Probably later in 2012, we'll be able to come up with a new methodology and model of assessing exchange rates.
Adapted from Knowledge@Wharton, http://www.knowledgeatwharton.com. To read the original, please visit: http://bit.ly/Hi70Qj
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 沪ICP证：沪ICP备05050403号-1
- |
- 互联网新闻信息服务许可证：31120180004
- |
- 网络视听许可证：0909346
- |
- 广播电视节目制作许可证：沪字第354号
- |
- 增值电信业务经营许可证：沪B2-20120012
Copyright © 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
