Home 禄 Opinion 禄 Foreign Views
Give the terminally ill choice to end misery
Print Edition
Inspired by the public advocacy of terminal brain cancer patient Brittany Maynard, lawmakers in Washington, DC, and at least 16 other states 鈥 from California to New York 鈥 have introduced bills that would authorize the medical option of aid in dying.
This legislation would allow mentally competent, terminally ill adults in the final stages of their disease the option to request a doctor鈥檚 prescription for aid-in-dying medication that they could choose to take it if their suffering becomes unbearable.
As a physician, I feel compelled to dispel the myths about these bills.
The Oregon law that is the model for this legislation has a stellar 17-year track record, with no scientifically documented cases of abuse or coercion. Dying adults who go through the lengthy process of obtaining the medication in Oregon hold onto it for weeks or months, as Brittany did, before taking it, if they take it at all. In fact, more than one-third of those who qualify for the medication never take it, according to the Oregon Public Health Department.
But having it in their possession gives these dying patients great comfort knowing they have it if their suffering does become unbearable and there is no other medical option available to help them.
Contrary to opponents鈥 claims, medical aid in dying is not 鈥渆uthanasia.鈥 It requires a doctor or nurse to administer the medication. Euthanasia is illegal throughout the United States.
Aid in dying also is not 鈥渁ssisted suicide,鈥 as critics wrongly call it.
The nation鈥檚 largest public health association, the American Public Health Association (not the American Medical Association), supports aid in dying.
It recognizes that 鈥渢he term 鈥榮uicide鈥 or 鈥榓ssisted suicide鈥 is inappropriate when discussing the choice of a mentally competent, terminally ill patient to seek medications that he or she could consume to bring about a peaceful and dignified death.鈥 The five states that authorize medical aid in dying 鈥 Oregon, Washington, Montana, Vermont and New Mexico 鈥 have separate laws prohibiting assisted suicide.
鈥業ncurable and terminal鈥
In addition, 17,000 US doctors from 28 medical specialties support by a 54 percent to 31 percent margin the decision of patients with 鈥渋ncurable and terminal鈥 diseases who want to end their own life, according to an online survey conducted by Medscape.
Despite the opposition to medical aid in dying by some disability groups, polls of people living with disabilities show they support this end-of-life option by about the same percentage as the general population.
As physicians, we should always provide quality end-of-life care for people who are suffering from an incurable and irreversible terminal illness.
Yet when a person with only months, weeks or even days to live cannot get relief from extreme pain, we should allow that person the option to end their suffering when the time comes. My 25-year-old daughter Emily Rose desperately pleaded for this option during the final few agonizing months of her life last spring when she suffered in horrific pain from terminal leukemia, despite getting great home hospice and palliative care.
Olvera is a Harvard-educated physician who specializes in family practice and sports medicine in Orange County, California. He is a volunteer for Compassion and Choices, the nation鈥檚 leading end-of-life choice advocacy organization. Copyright: American Forum
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 娌狪CP璇侊細娌狪CP澶05050403鍙-1
- |
- 浜掕仈缃戞柊闂讳俊鎭湇鍔¤鍙瘉锛31120180004
- |
- 缃戠粶瑙嗗惉璁稿彲璇侊細0909346
- |
- 骞挎挱鐢佃鑺傜洰鍒朵綔璁稿彲璇侊細娌瓧绗354鍙
- |
- 澧炲肩數淇′笟鍔＄粡钀ヨ鍙瘉锛氭勃B2-20120012
Copyright 漏 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
