Home » Opinion » Foreign Views
How economic growth and free trade enable low-cost ending of global poverty
Print Edition
POVERTY is humanity’s cruelest affliction. If you are extremely poor, you can’t afford to avoid even the easily curable diseases that cause every sixth human death.
Of course, the world has made great progress in the fight against poverty. In 1820, nine out of ten people lived in extreme poverty. The World Bank estimates that for the first time in human history, the global poverty rate dropped to single digits in 2015. Today 9.1 percent of the world’s population, or almost 700 million people, live on less than US$1.90 per day.
This US$1.90 threshold for extreme poverty is a tight limit: it is not what a wealthy tourist could buy in a low-cost, developing country. It is what an American could buy in the United States for US$1.90. The level is adjusted to the equivalent purchasing power in the local currency.
The late economist Anthony Clunies Ross made an initial attempt to calculate the cost of solving the poverty problem forever, by estimating how much money would be needed for cash transfers to lift every single person on the planet out of poverty. Let’s update his approach (an exercise also carried out recently by the Brookings Institution).
We can start by looking, for example, at Indonesia — with some 257 million people, the world’s fourth-most populous country. Just 20 years ago, about half of Indonesians were poor, whereas in 2014 (the most recent estimate) shows just over 8 percent, or 21 million people, below the US$1.90/day threshold.
On average, these Indonesians are 29 cents short of US$1.90; so 21 million people need 29 cents more every day — or about US$6 million in total — to get out of extreme poverty. Over a year, that adds up to US$2.2 billion.
Since this is based on what Americans could buy for US$2.2 billion in the United States, the actual cost in Indonesian rupiah would be much lower. The exchange-rate cost would be about US$700 million in actual dollars.
With an estimated 268 million people in extreme poverty in the latest survey from 2011, India is home to the largest absolute number of poor people on the planet. Each is on average 38 cents a day below the extreme poverty line.
Adjusting for the lack of data from states like Yemen, and Zimbabwe, the total cost of eradicating poverty based on the latest available data appears to be somewhat less than US$100 billion actual dollars. Brookings has extrapolated previous trends and data from other countries within regions, and finds that the cost in 2015 could well be as low as US$75 billion annually. To put this figure in context, the world spends US$140 billion on development aid each year.
Of course, this is a thought exercise with limits. In the real world, it would not be possible to identify all of the needy poor and distribute exactly 29 cents or 38 cents without incurring much higher costs. But it does let us identify the scale of the world’s biggest problem.
It is expected that there will be slightly fewer than 400 million poor in 2030, and income growth should almost completely eradicate poverty by 2060. Based on this information, we can estimate the aggregated future cost of eradicating poverty at about US$1.5 trillion. If we set aside the money now in a fund (which would accrue interest over the next 45 years), we would need a little less than US$1 trillion to eradicate human poverty forever.
Best solution
A trillion dollars sounds like a huge deal. In fact, it is equivalent to roughly 1 percent of annual global GDP, 18 months of US military spending, or one-twentieth of US national debt. It is also equivalent to the cost implied by just one year of the Paris climate agreement, which promises — if we keep paying a trillion every year — to rein in temperature rises by 0.17°C in 2100.
The real tragedy is that the best solution to poverty would not cost a thing. Broad-based economic growth has always been the most effective pathway to reducing deprivation: over 30 years, China’s economic growth spurt lifted an unprecedented 680 million people above the poverty line. A global free-trade agreement — such as a successful conclusion to the stalled Doha Development Round — would likely lift another 160 million people out of poverty.
Skepticism about free trade on the part of President Donald Trump and others means that we are missing out on an important opportunity. In the meantime, we should champion the most powerful development investments: spending on child nutrition, immunization, early childhood education, and scholarships for girls can lead to meaningful, lifelong improvements in health and income levels.
But we should also realize that, for the first time ever, an end to poverty is actually within humanity’s financial reach. And we should challenge our political leaders to account for expensive policies that achieve much less.
Bjørn Lomborg is Director of the Copenhagen Consensus Center and a visiting professor at the Copenhagen Business School. Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2017.www.project-syndicate.org. Shanghai Daily condensed the article.
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 沪ICP证：沪ICP备05050403号-1
- |
- 互联网新闻信息服务许可证：31120180004
- |
- 网络视听许可证：0909346
- |
- 广播电视节目制作许可证：沪字第354号
- |
- 增值电信业务经营许可证：沪B2-20120012
Copyright © 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
