Home 禄 Opinion 禄 Foreign Views
It鈥檚 not just Flint where our kids are in danger
Print Edition
Brown, foul-smelling water spewing out of faucets. Children poisoned by lead and other toxic metals. Families with aching joints, brittle bones, and shocking hair loss.
These images have been flowing out of Flint, Michigan since late last year as the scope and impact of the city鈥檚 austerity-driven water contamination crisis has become increasingly clear.
But pollution, contamination, and toxic chemicals that harm children鈥檚 health aren鈥檛 confined to Flint. America鈥檚 children are being exposed to a host of toxic chemical hazards.
From deteriorating lead paint still widespread in many communities, to toxic toys sold at dollar stores, to dangerous chemical facilities near homes and schools, we鈥檙e putting our kids in danger.
All children, but especially those under age five, are susceptible to toxic chemicals because their bodies and brains are still growing and developing. However, there is a striking inequality in the likelihood that children of color and those living in poverty will be exposed to dangerous substances. That disparity is especially clear when we look at facilities that use, store, or produce toxic chemicals.
A recent report from the Center for Effective Government found that nearly one in ten school kids attend school within a mile of a hazardous chemical facility.
Almost two-thirds of the kids who live in homes near these facilities are children of color. Children of color living in poverty are especially hard hit.
Living near a dangerous chemical facility increases the chances of being exposed to toxic air or water pollution. These facilities operate in just about every state in the nation, though they are more densely concentrated in the Midwest, the South, the Mid-Atlantic, and California.
Living in a fenceline community also increases the risk of exposure should a large-scale chemical disaster occur. Again, that danger is greater in communities of color.
Solutions at hand
Tackling this environmental injustice and protecting our children from dangerous chemicals require significant effort, but there are solutions at hand.
First, national standards should require that manufacturers and chemical facilities switch to the safest alternative substances available, when feasible. This has happened at water treatment plants and bleach manufacturing facilities, but many more plants continue to pose a serious risk to children and nearby communities by using deadly chlorine gas and other toxic substances.
Other steps local, state, or federal agencies can take include adopting new zoning laws or revising existing ones to block construction of new or expanded chemical facilities near homes and schools and to prevent new homes and schools from being built in fenceline zones; requiring chemical facilities to continuously monitor and report their fenceline-area emissions to agencies and the public; and improving enforcement of existing environmental and workplace health and safety regulations.
Our children deserve to be protected from chemicals that damage their brains, disrupt their ability to learn, wreak havoc on their developing reproductive systems, cause cancer, or spark deadly disasters next door to their homes and schools. We owe it to them to require commonsense solutions to reduce or eliminate these dangers.
White is the director of regulatory policy at the Center for Effective Government. Rauch is the public health policy director at Moms Clean Air Force. Copyright: American Forum
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 娌狪CP璇侊細娌狪CP澶05050403鍙-1
- |
- 浜掕仈缃戞柊闂讳俊鎭湇鍔¤鍙瘉锛31120180004
- |
- 缃戠粶瑙嗗惉璁稿彲璇侊細0909346
- |
- 骞挎挱鐢佃鑺傜洰鍒朵綔璁稿彲璇侊細娌瓧绗354鍙
- |
- 澧炲肩數淇′笟鍔＄粡钀ヨ鍙瘉锛氭勃B2-20120012
Copyright 漏 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
