Home » Opinion » Foreign Views
Looking for the next growth economies
By Jim O'Neill |
February 15, 2011, Tuesday
|
Print Edition
Print Edition
IT has been nine years since I coined the acronym "BRIC," which has become synonymous with the rise of Brazil, Russia, India, and China.
It has been more than seven years since my colleagues at Goldman Sachs and I first published an outlook to 2050 in which we suggested that the four BRIC economies could emerge bigger than the G7 economies, and, together with the United States, would constitute the world's five largest.
It also has been more than five years since the expression "Next Eleven," or "N-11," first appeared. That term bracketed the next 11 largest countries by population, and sought to determine their BRIC-like potential.
These 15 countries drive most of the positive momentum behind the world economy nowadays. China has overtaken Japan as the world's second largest economy, with output roughly equal to that of the other three BRIC countries combined. Their aggregate GDP stands at around US$11 trillion, or about 80 percent of the US level.
Domestic demand in the BRIC countries is even more impressive. The collective dollar value of BRIC consumers is estimated conservatively at just over US$4 trillion, possibly US$4.5 trillion. The US consumer market is worth more than double that - around US$10.5 trillion - but BRIC consumer power is currently growing at an annual rate in dollar terms of around 15 percent, which means an annual rate of roughly US$600 billion.
If this pace is maintained, BRIC consumers will be adding another US$1 trillion to the global economy by the middle of this decade. By the end of the decade, they will be worth more than US consumers.
Beyond the BRICs, among the likely top 10 contributors to global GDP growth this decade are South Korea, Mexico, and Turkey. From the so-called developed world, only the US is guaranteed a place on this list - and the top 20 could include Iran, Nigeria, the Philippines, and Vietnam. So how should we now think about the term "emerging markets"?
A few weeks ago, I decided with my colleagues to pursue the term "growth economies," which Goldman Sachs adopted in 2010 to describe how we treat many of the world's most dynamic markets.
At its simplest, a growth economy should be regarded as one that is likely to experience rising productivity, which, together with favorable demographics, points to economic growth that outpaces the global average.
But an economy also needs sufficient size and depth in order to allow investors not only to invest, but also to exit when appropriate.
Definition
So we opted for the following: any economy outside the so-called developed world that accounts for at least 1 percent of current global GDP should be defined as a growth economy. At this size, currently around US$600 billion, an economy should be large enough to allow investors and businesses to operate as they do in advanced countries, yet also be likely to grow faster. All other economies should continue to be defined as emerging markets.
According to this definition, eight countries currently qualify: the BRIC countries, along with South Korea, Indonesia, Mexico, and Turkey, while others - including Saudi Arabia, Iran, Nigeria, and the Philippines - could join the list in the next 20 years.
In the past few decades, it has become conventional for equity investors to base their decisions on neutral benchmarks determined by the market capitalization of companies and indices. But this gives much more weight to the US economy and its companies relative to so-called emerging markets.
An alternative approach is to use a GDP-weighted benchmark. For aggressive investors, a benchmark that incorporates future predicted GDP gives a lot more weight to emerging markets, especially to the growth economies.
(Jim O'Neill is Chairman of Goldman Sachs Asset Management and a member of the board of the Bruegel think tank. Copyright: Project Syndicate/Europe's World, 2011.www.project-syndicate.org www.europesworld.org. Shanghai Daily condensed the article.)
It has been more than seven years since my colleagues at Goldman Sachs and I first published an outlook to 2050 in which we suggested that the four BRIC economies could emerge bigger than the G7 economies, and, together with the United States, would constitute the world's five largest.
It also has been more than five years since the expression "Next Eleven," or "N-11," first appeared. That term bracketed the next 11 largest countries by population, and sought to determine their BRIC-like potential.
These 15 countries drive most of the positive momentum behind the world economy nowadays. China has overtaken Japan as the world's second largest economy, with output roughly equal to that of the other three BRIC countries combined. Their aggregate GDP stands at around US$11 trillion, or about 80 percent of the US level.
Domestic demand in the BRIC countries is even more impressive. The collective dollar value of BRIC consumers is estimated conservatively at just over US$4 trillion, possibly US$4.5 trillion. The US consumer market is worth more than double that - around US$10.5 trillion - but BRIC consumer power is currently growing at an annual rate in dollar terms of around 15 percent, which means an annual rate of roughly US$600 billion.
If this pace is maintained, BRIC consumers will be adding another US$1 trillion to the global economy by the middle of this decade. By the end of the decade, they will be worth more than US consumers.
Beyond the BRICs, among the likely top 10 contributors to global GDP growth this decade are South Korea, Mexico, and Turkey. From the so-called developed world, only the US is guaranteed a place on this list - and the top 20 could include Iran, Nigeria, the Philippines, and Vietnam. So how should we now think about the term "emerging markets"?
A few weeks ago, I decided with my colleagues to pursue the term "growth economies," which Goldman Sachs adopted in 2010 to describe how we treat many of the world's most dynamic markets.
At its simplest, a growth economy should be regarded as one that is likely to experience rising productivity, which, together with favorable demographics, points to economic growth that outpaces the global average.
But an economy also needs sufficient size and depth in order to allow investors not only to invest, but also to exit when appropriate.
Definition
So we opted for the following: any economy outside the so-called developed world that accounts for at least 1 percent of current global GDP should be defined as a growth economy. At this size, currently around US$600 billion, an economy should be large enough to allow investors and businesses to operate as they do in advanced countries, yet also be likely to grow faster. All other economies should continue to be defined as emerging markets.
According to this definition, eight countries currently qualify: the BRIC countries, along with South Korea, Indonesia, Mexico, and Turkey, while others - including Saudi Arabia, Iran, Nigeria, and the Philippines - could join the list in the next 20 years.
In the past few decades, it has become conventional for equity investors to base their decisions on neutral benchmarks determined by the market capitalization of companies and indices. But this gives much more weight to the US economy and its companies relative to so-called emerging markets.
An alternative approach is to use a GDP-weighted benchmark. For aggressive investors, a benchmark that incorporates future predicted GDP gives a lot more weight to emerging markets, especially to the growth economies.
(Jim O'Neill is Chairman of Goldman Sachs Asset Management and a member of the board of the Bruegel think tank. Copyright: Project Syndicate/Europe's World, 2011.www.project-syndicate.org www.europesworld.org. Shanghai Daily condensed the article.)
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 沪ICP证：沪ICP备05050403号-1
- |
- 互联网新闻信息服务许可证：31120180004
- |
- 网络视听许可证：0909346
- |
- 广播电视节目制作许可证：沪字第354号
- |
- 增值电信业务经营许可证：沪B2-20120012
Copyright © 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
