Home 禄 Opinion 禄 Foreign Views
Ocean governance and conservation require short-term sacrifices for long-term gains
Print Edition
Sharks and their cousins, the rays, predate the dinosaurs. They survived the catastrophic mass extinction that finished off Tyrannosaurus Rex and all the rest, as well the Permian-Triassic extinction that wiped out around 96 percent of marine species. Even the more recently evolved shark lineages, such as the hammerheads, have been around for more than 30 million years.
Yet in just a few decades, a quarter of all sharks and rays have become threatened with extinction. This is our fault 鈥 and it is our responsibility to fix it.
Shark and ray populations are not alone. Many other components of marine biodiversity 鈥 especially corals, marine mammals, seabirds, and turtles 鈥 are also struggling to withstand human pressures.
Given the broad range of threats facing marine life 鈥 including overfishing, climate change, pollution, and coastal development 鈥 it is easy, perhaps even rational, to be pessimistic. Yet this year could mark the beginning of a more robust approach to safeguarding ocean ecosystems, particularly with regard to overfishing, which is responsible for precipitous declines in many species.
The challenge ahead should not be underestimated. Meeting it will require overcoming one of the most intractable obstacles to marine conservation: ensuring the sustainability of biodiversity in the roughly 60 percent of the world鈥檚 oceans that lie beyond the jurisdiction of individual states.
Within the 200-nautical-mile limit that comprises their exclusive economic zones (EEZs), a few countries have used a combination of strong legislation, good management, and effective enforcement to preserve fish stocks and ecosystems.
Beyond the EEZs, however, a pernicious problem arises: most living resources are de facto open-access, leaving them vulnerable to overexploitation.
At present, a web of legislation 鈥 including the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Food and Agriculture Organization guidelines, and the Fish Stocks Agreement, as well as the Convention on Migratory Species of Wild Animals 鈥 governs activities that may affect biodiversity on the high seas. Yet the protection afforded to living resources remains limited 鈥 and riddled with loopholes.
For example, because not all countries are signatories to these agreements, vessels can choose which flag to fly to avoid being bound by regulations (a 鈥渇lag of convenience鈥). Some fisheries remain outside the jurisdiction of any of the regional bodies that play a role in resource management. As a result, illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing is worth billions of dollars per year.
Promising step
One promising step, recommended by a UN working group in January, is the development of a new, legally binding agreement on high-seas biodiversity, to be ready for the UN General Assembly to review by September.
Such a coordinated framework may help to close regional gaps in governance; compel existing fisheries bodies to work to improve outcomes; and ultimately enable the development of new bodies that are focused on management and protection of ecosystems, not only fish stocks. That, in turn, may catalyze the cooperation needed to create high seas marine protected areas, which would enable damaged or depleted ecosystems to recover.
Of course, to be effective, such areas must be monitored. A promising development has been the use of satellite technology to detect and address fisheries violations by individual vessels. This could bring about a profound change for the better in ocean management, particularly for countries with large EEZs and limited marine enforcement capacity.
A coordinated system for responding to violations is also vital. Closing ports to vessels that break the rules could be achieved through the Port State Measures Agreement, currently awaiting ratification.
Ocean governance and conservation is at a critical juncture. Marine resources cannot be overexploited indefinitely. The forthcoming 鈥渂iodiversity beyond national jurisdiction鈥 agreement, underpinned by novel ways of monitoring compliance, could improve ocean management.
The difficulty is that better management assumes we choose long-term sustainability over short-term profits. Whether we will overcome our inclination to choose otherwise remains to be seen.
Derek Tittensor is Senior Marine Biodiversity Scientist at the United Nations Environment Program World Conservation Monitoring Center. Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2015.www.project-syndicate.org. Shanghai Daily condensed the article.
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 娌狪CP璇侊細娌狪CP澶05050403鍙-1
- |
- 浜掕仈缃戞柊闂讳俊鎭湇鍔¤鍙瘉锛31120180004
- |
- 缃戠粶瑙嗗惉璁稿彲璇侊細0909346
- |
- 骞挎挱鐢佃鑺傜洰鍒朵綔璁稿彲璇侊細娌瓧绗354鍙
- |
- 澧炲肩數淇′笟鍔＄粡钀ヨ鍙瘉锛氭勃B2-20120012
Copyright 漏 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
