Home » Opinion » Foreign Views
Promise of justice for climate-change victims
Print Edition
Earlier this year in Myanmar, torrential rain caused mudslides that wiped out hundreds of houses and caused large-scale crop destruction.
In Vietnam, the same deluges caused toxic slurry pits from coal mines to overflow and run through villages, and into the country’s famed Ha Long Bay.
As such weather events become increasingly frequent and intense, the need to mitigate and adapt to climate change is becoming more urgent than ever. And make no mistake: These events are, at least partly, the result of climate change. International climate negotiators recognize this, to some extent.
The effects faced by the people of Myanmar and Vietnam are considered unavoidable costs of failing to adapt to climate change, which officials classify as “loss and damage.”
Bloodless rhetoric
But such language fails to capture the full scale of the consequences — especially their impact on human lives.
The people who died in Myanmar and Vietnam are not just “unavoidable costs,” and their loved ones cannot simply “adapt” to losing them.
This kind of bloodless rhetoric reflects the inadequacy of the responses to climate change that international negotiations have so far produced.
In fact, if the industrialized world had done what was needed to stop climate change, as promised a generation ago, Myanmar and Vietnam most likely would have been spared their recent “loss and damage.”
The so-called advanced economies failure to fulfill their commitments means that Myanmar and Vietnam are hardly the most vulnerable developing countries today.
The tiny island states of the Pacific, for example, have been unable to erect adequate defenses against the “king tides” that are encroaching on their land and causing the freshwater “lenses” beneath their atolls to become brackish.
Their populations — among the world’s poorest people — are paying for climate change with their lives and livelihoods.
Recognizing the blatant injustice — not to mention the destructiveness — of this state of affairs, a new initiative, launched by the Carbon Levy Project and supported by a growing number of individuals and organizations, has emerged to demand compensation for vulnerable developing countries from the big polluters.
Make polluters pay
Specifically, the Carbon Levy Project proposes a tax at the point of extraction for fossil fuels. Such a tax is consistent with international law, including the “polluter pays” principle, and would provide a new and predictable source of finance — amounting to billions of dollars — for the communities that need it most.
Fortunately, the world will not have to wait for moral suasion to carry the day.
Fossil-fuel companies and governments are already facing intensifying legal pressure.
The Dutch group Urgenda and nearly 900 co-plaintiffs successfully sued the Dutch government, forcing it to adopt more stringent climate policies. A Peruvian farmer now intends to sue the German coal company RWE to cover the costs of protecting his home, which lies in the flood path of a glacial lake.
If no action is taken, such lawsuits will only become more frequent and difficult to defeat. Big Oil, Big Gas and Big Coal need to accept responsibility for climate change and start making real contributions to adaptation, or prepare to battle for their own survival — a battle that, in the long term, they simply cannot win.
Stephen Leonard is President of the Australia-based Climate Justice Program. Copyright: Project Syndicate 1995–2015. Shanghai Daily condensed the article.
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 沪ICP证：沪ICP备05050403号-1
- |
- 互联网新闻信息服务许可证：31120180004
- |
- 网络视听许可证：0909346
- |
- 广播电视节目制作许可证：沪字第354号
- |
- 增值电信业务经营许可证：沪B2-20120012
Copyright © 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
