Home 禄 Opinion 禄 Press Notes
A bridge too far is a bridge that may collapse too soon
By People's Daily |
July 19, 2011, Tuesday
|
Print Edition
Print Edition
LAST week witnessed the collapses of three bridges in China, all of which had been in service for no more than 14 years. These accidents prompt us to ask why relatively new bridges are so fragile?
Official probes initially blamed the collapses on overloaded trucks. Under mounting public outcry, officials admitted that the bridges succumbed to inherent design flaws and lack of safety oversight.
Omens were plenty before these accidents. In the case of the Qianjiang No.3 Bridge that caved in on July 15 in Hangzhou, some Netizens had predicted its demise four years ago, while the Wuyishan Bridge in Fujian Province, which broke in half and killed one person on July 14, were long found to be overloaded with traffic. Yet its operator and the local road management team both shirked their responsibility to plug the safety loopholes.
This has almost been a norm. Where there is money involved, all the stakeholders vie for bridges' control. When accidents occur, they stumble and plead innocence. Even though they fully knew the possibility of a collapse was real, they neglected daily maintenance and failed to strictly conduct safety checks of the bridges.
This kind of lax supervision and routine post-disaster stonewalling suggests that there will only be more such "accidents" in the future.
Official probes initially blamed the collapses on overloaded trucks. Under mounting public outcry, officials admitted that the bridges succumbed to inherent design flaws and lack of safety oversight.
Omens were plenty before these accidents. In the case of the Qianjiang No.3 Bridge that caved in on July 15 in Hangzhou, some Netizens had predicted its demise four years ago, while the Wuyishan Bridge in Fujian Province, which broke in half and killed one person on July 14, were long found to be overloaded with traffic. Yet its operator and the local road management team both shirked their responsibility to plug the safety loopholes.
This has almost been a norm. Where there is money involved, all the stakeholders vie for bridges' control. When accidents occur, they stumble and plead innocence. Even though they fully knew the possibility of a collapse was real, they neglected daily maintenance and failed to strictly conduct safety checks of the bridges.
This kind of lax supervision and routine post-disaster stonewalling suggests that there will only be more such "accidents" in the future.
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 娌狪CP璇侊細娌狪CP澶05050403鍙-1
- |
- 浜掕仈缃戞柊闂讳俊鎭湇鍔¤鍙瘉锛31120180004
- |
- 缃戠粶瑙嗗惉璁稿彲璇侊細0909346
- |
- 骞挎挱鐢佃鑺傜洰鍒朵綔璁稿彲璇侊細娌瓧绗354鍙
- |
- 澧炲肩數淇′笟鍔＄粡钀ヨ鍙瘉锛氭勃B2-20120012
Copyright 漏 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
