Ball-tampering row rages on
Source: Agencies |
January 8, 2010, Friday
|
Print Edition
Print Edition
ENGLAND was lucky to escape unpunished from a ball-tampering controversy in its third test against South Africa, according to former captain Michael Vaughan.
"England should treat the whole ball-tampering incident as a warning," he wrote in a column in the Daily Telegraph yesterday.
"They were lucky to get away without an official reprimand, or even a ban, because there is no doubt in my mind that they were trying to change the condition of the ball."
South Africa raised concerns about the ball during the third day of the third test in Cape Town after television pictures showed England bowler Stuart Broad stopping the ball with his foot. Footage also suggested seamer Jimmy Anderson may have been picking the seam with his thumbnail.
The International Cricket Council decided no action would be taken, however, after South Africa made no official complaint.
Vaughan said Broad had been stopping the ball with his boot all the way through the series and recalled similar examples from his own England days.
"When I was captain, I would get my attack to bowl cross-seam bouncers at some point around the 15th over. You never knew which side of the ball was going to hit the pitch and become scuffed up, but after you had done it three or four times, you chose one side to shine and one to keep rough.
"Marcus Trescothick used to be our shiner: he would suck jelly babies to make one side of the ball sugary," he said. "I don't really know whether it made any difference, but I do know that we had a good summer with reverse swing in 2005."
Vaughan and Nasser Hussain, also a former England captain, said there would have been uproar had other nationalities been involved.
"There is no doubt in my mind that, if a Pakistani or Indian bowler had been caught doing what Anderson did, we would have said he was cheating," Hussain wrote in the Daily Mail. "I do not think the ICC have covered themselves in glory here," he added.
South Africa batsman AB de Villiers also voiced his concerns.
"Climbing on the ball with your spikes is obviously not on," De Villiers said. "We'd all like to get the ball reversing and swinging all over the place but it must be done legally. I thought we did make an official complaint because (coach) Mickey Arthur said he had sent an email through."
Meanwhile, Paul Collingwood and Ian Bell checked South Africa's progress with a tenacious partnership that took England to 230 for five at tea on the final day yesterday.
England had stumbled to 179 for five at lunch with thoughts of a world-record run-chase of 466 long gone as they sought instead to survive 90 overs after starting the day on 132 for three.
"England should treat the whole ball-tampering incident as a warning," he wrote in a column in the Daily Telegraph yesterday.
"They were lucky to get away without an official reprimand, or even a ban, because there is no doubt in my mind that they were trying to change the condition of the ball."
South Africa raised concerns about the ball during the third day of the third test in Cape Town after television pictures showed England bowler Stuart Broad stopping the ball with his foot. Footage also suggested seamer Jimmy Anderson may have been picking the seam with his thumbnail.
The International Cricket Council decided no action would be taken, however, after South Africa made no official complaint.
Vaughan said Broad had been stopping the ball with his boot all the way through the series and recalled similar examples from his own England days.
"When I was captain, I would get my attack to bowl cross-seam bouncers at some point around the 15th over. You never knew which side of the ball was going to hit the pitch and become scuffed up, but after you had done it three or four times, you chose one side to shine and one to keep rough.
"Marcus Trescothick used to be our shiner: he would suck jelly babies to make one side of the ball sugary," he said. "I don't really know whether it made any difference, but I do know that we had a good summer with reverse swing in 2005."
Vaughan and Nasser Hussain, also a former England captain, said there would have been uproar had other nationalities been involved.
"There is no doubt in my mind that, if a Pakistani or Indian bowler had been caught doing what Anderson did, we would have said he was cheating," Hussain wrote in the Daily Mail. "I do not think the ICC have covered themselves in glory here," he added.
South Africa batsman AB de Villiers also voiced his concerns.
"Climbing on the ball with your spikes is obviously not on," De Villiers said. "We'd all like to get the ball reversing and swinging all over the place but it must be done legally. I thought we did make an official complaint because (coach) Mickey Arthur said he had sent an email through."
Meanwhile, Paul Collingwood and Ian Bell checked South Africa's progress with a tenacious partnership that took England to 230 for five at tea on the final day yesterday.
England had stumbled to 179 for five at lunch with thoughts of a world-record run-chase of 466 long gone as they sought instead to survive 90 overs after starting the day on 132 for three.
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 沪ICP证：沪ICP备05050403号-1
- |
- 互联网新闻信息服务许可证：31120180004
- |
- 网络视听许可证：0909346
- |
- 广播电视节目制作许可证：沪字第354号
- |
- 增值电信业务经营许可证：沪B2-20120012
Copyright © 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
