The story appears on

Page B7

August 22, 2012

GET this page in PDF

Free for subscribers

View shopping cart

Related News

Home » Sports » Cycling

US judge dismisses Armstrong suit against USADA

A US federal judge on Monday dismissed seven-time Tour de France winner Lance Armstrong's effort to block a probe into whether the retired cycling champ cheated by using performance-enhancing drugs.

Last month, US District Judge Sam Sparks, in Austin, Texas, dismissed Armstrong's original bid to stop the US Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) from proceeding with its case, calling the lawsuit a "lengthy and bitter polemic." But Sparks allowed Armstrong's lawyers to file an amended lawsuit. On Monday, Sparks threw out the revised complaint, though he dismissed it "without prejudice," meaning Armstrong can try again.

Accusations of doping have dogged Armstrong, who won seven straight Tour de France championships between 1999 and 2005 when he ascended to the top of the cycling world after overcoming cancer.

USADA chief executive Travis Tygart said the agency was pleased with the ruling and defended its process for investigating doping charges, saying it had "protected the rights of athletes for over a decade."

Conspiracy

The USADA, a quasi-governmental agency created by the US Congress in 2000, formally charged Armstrong in June with doping and taking part in a conspiracy with members of his championship teams. Five other cyclists have been accused of conspiring with Armstrong over the course of 14 years to hide doping activity.

The agency said in a letter to Armstrong that it has blood samples from 2009 and 2010 that are "fully consistent" with doping.

In the letter, which was published in the Washington Post, the agency said it also has at least 10 former teammates and colleagues of Armstrong who will testify he used doping drugs during races from 1999 to 2005.

Lawyers for Armstrong contend the USADA gathered evidence by threatening to ruin the careers of fellow cyclists who have agreed to testify against him. Lawyers for Armstrong also argue that the agency's rules violate Armstrong's right to a fair trial and that it lacks proper jurisdiction to charge him.

Armstrong's attorneys contend that he has "passed every drug test ever administered to him in his career - a total of 500 to 600 tests... more drug tests than any athlete in history."




 

Copyright © 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.

沪公网安备 31010602000204号

Email this to your friend