Related News
Adultery decriminalized in South Korea
Print Edition
South Korea鈥檚 Constitutional Court yesterday struck down a controversial adultery law which for more than 60 years had criminalized extra-marital sex and jailed violators for up to two years.
The nine-member bench ruled by seven to two that the 1953 statute aimed at protecting traditional family values was unconstitutional. 鈥淓ven if adultery should be condemned as immoral, state power should not intervene in individuals鈥 private lives,鈥 said presiding justice Park Han-Chul.
The decision saw shares in the South Korean firm Unidus Corp, one of the world鈥檚 largest condom manufacturers, soar by the daily limit of 15 percent on the local stock exchange.
It was the fifth time the apex court had considered the constitutional legality of the legislation which had made South Korea one of the few non-Muslim countries to regard marital infidelity as a criminal act.
In the past six years, close to 5,500 people have been formerly arraigned on adultery charges, including nearly 900 in 2014.
But the numbers had been falling, with cases that ended in prison terms increasingly rare.
Whereas 216 people were jailed under the law in 2004, that figure had dropped to 42 by 2008, and since then only 22 have found themselves behind bars, according to figures from the state prosecution office.
The downward trend was partly a reflection of changing societal trends in a country where rapid modernization has frequently clashed with traditionally conservative norms.
鈥淧ublic conceptions of individuals鈥 rights in their sexual lives have undergone changes,鈥 Park said, as he delivered the court鈥檚 decision.
Reading the dissenting opinion, Justice Ahn Chang-Ho insisted the 1953 statute was a key protector of family morals, and warned that its abolition would 鈥渟park a surge in debauchery.鈥
Under the law, adultery could only be prosecuted on complaint from an injured party, and any case was closed immediately if the plaintiff dropped the charge 鈥 a common occurrence that often involved a financial settlement.
The law was designed to protect the rights of women at a time when marriage afforded them few legal rights, with most having no independent income and divorce carrying enormous social stigma.
But even socially conservative civic groups who had supported the legislation in the past acknowledged that times had changed.
鈥淎dultery must be censured morally and socially, but such a law is inappropriate in a modern society,鈥 said Ko Seon-Ju, an activist with the Seoul-based civic group Healthy Families.
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 娌狪CP璇侊細娌狪CP澶05050403鍙-1
- |
- 浜掕仈缃戞柊闂讳俊鎭湇鍔¤鍙瘉锛31120180004
- |
- 缃戠粶瑙嗗惉璁稿彲璇侊細0909346
- |
- 骞挎挱鐢佃鑺傜洰鍒朵綔璁稿彲璇侊細娌瓧绗354鍙
- |
- 澧炲肩數淇′笟鍔＄粡钀ヨ鍙瘉锛氭勃B2-20120012
Copyright 漏 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
