Animals don't need lawyers,say Swiss
Source: Agencies |
March 8, 2010, Monday
|
Print Edition
Print Edition
PROJECTIONS show Swiss voters have rejected a plan to appoint lawyers for animals that have been abused by humans, Swiss national television reported yesterday.
Projections by political polling organization gfs.bern indicate 71 percent of voters cast their ballot against the proposal by animal rights activists to extend nationwide a system already in place in Zurich since 1992.
"The Swiss people have clearly said our animal protection laws are so good we don't need animal lawyers," said Jakob Buechler, a lawmaker for the centrist Christian People's Party.
Switzerland tightened its animal protection laws two years ago and now has among the strictest rules anywhere when it comes to caring for pets and farm animals. Pigs, budgies, goldfish and other social animals cannot be kept alone; horses and cows must have regular exercise outside their stalls; and dog owners have to take a training course to learn how to properly look after their pets.
Tiana Angelina Moser, a lawmaker for the Green Liberal Party, said animal rights campaigners would now be looking for other ways to make sure laws against animal abuse are properly applied and those who hurt them receive appropriate punishment.
According to the country's only animal lawyer, Antoine F Goetschel, public prosecutors are often unsure about the new law and shy away from marginal cases even if there is clear evidence of abuse.
Goetschel said he represents about 150-200 animals annually in Zurich, while in other cantons (states) only a handful of cases go to court.
Opponents had argued that existing laws are sufficient and appointing lawyers for animals would incur unnecessary costs for taxpayers.
Projections by political polling organization gfs.bern indicate 71 percent of voters cast their ballot against the proposal by animal rights activists to extend nationwide a system already in place in Zurich since 1992.
"The Swiss people have clearly said our animal protection laws are so good we don't need animal lawyers," said Jakob Buechler, a lawmaker for the centrist Christian People's Party.
Switzerland tightened its animal protection laws two years ago and now has among the strictest rules anywhere when it comes to caring for pets and farm animals. Pigs, budgies, goldfish and other social animals cannot be kept alone; horses and cows must have regular exercise outside their stalls; and dog owners have to take a training course to learn how to properly look after their pets.
Tiana Angelina Moser, a lawmaker for the Green Liberal Party, said animal rights campaigners would now be looking for other ways to make sure laws against animal abuse are properly applied and those who hurt them receive appropriate punishment.
According to the country's only animal lawyer, Antoine F Goetschel, public prosecutors are often unsure about the new law and shy away from marginal cases even if there is clear evidence of abuse.
Goetschel said he represents about 150-200 animals annually in Zurich, while in other cantons (states) only a handful of cases go to court.
Opponents had argued that existing laws are sufficient and appointing lawyers for animals would incur unnecessary costs for taxpayers.
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 娌狪CP璇侊細娌狪CP澶05050403鍙-1
- |
- 浜掕仈缃戞柊闂讳俊鎭湇鍔¤鍙瘉锛31120180004
- |
- 缃戠粶瑙嗗惉璁稿彲璇侊細0909346
- |
- 骞挎挱鐢佃鑺傜洰鍒朵綔璁稿彲璇侊細娌瓧绗354鍙
- |
- 澧炲肩數淇′笟鍔＄粡钀ヨ鍙瘉锛氭勃B2-20120012
Copyright 漏 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
