The story appears on

Page A10

April 30, 2010

GET this page in PDF

Free for subscribers

View shopping cart

Related News

Home » World

Australia proposes plain look for smokes

TOBACCO companies would be forced to use plain, logo-free packaging on their cigarettes in a bid to make them less attractive to smokers under legislation introduced yesterday by Australia's government, which dubbed the move a world-first.

The rules, which would take effect on July 1, 2012, would ban tobacco companies from including logos, promotional text or colorful images on cigarette packages. Graphic government health warnings would be prominently displayed instead, with the brand name relegated to tiny, generic font at the bottom.

"The new branding for cigarettes will be the most hard-line regime in the world and cigarette companies will hate it," Prime Minister Kevin Rudd said.

The government also announced plans to increase the cigarette tax by 25 percent, driving up the price of a pack of 30 cigarettes by about A$2.16 (US$2). The tax was to go into effect at midnight yesterday.

Tobacco companies immediately blasted the packaging crackdown and vowed to fight it in court.

"Introducing plain packaging just takes away the ability of a consumer to identify our brand from another brand and that's of value to us," Imperial Tobacco Australia spokeswoman Cathie Keogh told Australian Broadcasting Corp radio.

Retailers said the tax hike would hurt their businesses and bolster the cigarette black market.

"It's a lazy policy response being pushed by some health advocates," Mick Daly, National Chairman of Australian supermarket chain IGA, said in a statement. "That amounts to a direct attack on approximately 16 percent of Australians who have made legal and legitimate lifestyle choices."

Tim Wilson, director of intellectual property and free trade at Australia's Institute of Public Affairs, said taxpayers could end up paying around A$3 billion a year in compensation to tobacco companies.

"Under Australia's constitution, if the government basically takes someone's property rights, including intellectual property such as trademarks, or devalues them to a significant extent, they have to provide compensation," Wilson said. "I'd be shocked if they didn't [pursue compensation], because if it happens here, it'll happen all over the world."





 

Copyright © 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.

沪公网安备 31010602000204号

Email this to your friend