Home
News
In Focus
Business
Metro
Nation
World
Sports
Feature
Opinion
View more »Opinion Columns
Wan LixinOpinion deputy editor of Shanghai Daily
Restaurants get off to a quick start thanks to game-changing policies
High service charges on event ticket refunds call for further regulation
Sunday
- Subscribe
Britain gains new Supreme Court
Source: Agencies |
October 6, 2009, Tuesday
|
Print Edition
Print Edition
BRITAIN'S most powerful judges take up their first case this week with new robes, new titles, a new courtroom and, some argue, more power.
Yesterday marked the hearing of the first case by Britain's new Supreme Court, a group of 12 justices who were previously known as the Law Lords.
They were due to hear an appeal by five unnamed terror suspects who have had their financial assets frozen by the British government. The five now need to ask formal permission to access their money to buy groceries and other living expenses.
A High Court judge ruled last year that Britain's finance department had no right to freeze suspects' bank accounts, but that decision was later overturned by the Court of Appeal.
The justices hearing the case used to make their rulings from the red benches of the stately House of Lords. But they now hear cases in a newly renovated Supreme Court building, which was previously known as the Middlesex Guildhall.
The removal of the nation's highest court from the legislature is meant to emphasize Britain's separation of powers.
One leading judge has argued that the focus on independence might make the new court more muscular in its judgments -- and potentially more ambitious. In an interview with BBC radio last month, David Neuberger, one of the country's most senior judges, said there was a risk of the Supreme Court justices "arrogating to themselves greater power than they have at the moment."
But the Supreme Court's president, Lord Phillips, said such a move was unlikely.
Yesterday marked the hearing of the first case by Britain's new Supreme Court, a group of 12 justices who were previously known as the Law Lords.
They were due to hear an appeal by five unnamed terror suspects who have had their financial assets frozen by the British government. The five now need to ask formal permission to access their money to buy groceries and other living expenses.
A High Court judge ruled last year that Britain's finance department had no right to freeze suspects' bank accounts, but that decision was later overturned by the Court of Appeal.
The justices hearing the case used to make their rulings from the red benches of the stately House of Lords. But they now hear cases in a newly renovated Supreme Court building, which was previously known as the Middlesex Guildhall.
The removal of the nation's highest court from the legislature is meant to emphasize Britain's separation of powers.
One leading judge has argued that the focus on independence might make the new court more muscular in its judgments -- and potentially more ambitious. In an interview with BBC radio last month, David Neuberger, one of the country's most senior judges, said there was a risk of the Supreme Court justices "arrogating to themselves greater power than they have at the moment."
But the Supreme Court's president, Lord Phillips, said such a move was unlikely.
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 沪ICP证：沪ICP备05050403号-1
- |
- 互联网新闻信息服务许可证：31120180004
- |
- 网络视听许可证：0909346
- |
- 广播电视节目制作许可证：沪字第354号
- |
- 增值电信业务经营许可证：沪B2-20120012
Copyright © 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
