Clinton stresses need for diplomats at investigation into mission attack
Print Edition
HILLARY Clinton yesterday came face-to-face with the Republican-led special investigation into the 2012 deadly attacks on a US diplomatic mission in Libya, hoping to put to rest the worst episode of her tenure as secretary of state and clear an obstacle in her presidential campaign.
Democrats say the investigation is a ploy to derail Clinton’s White House bid.
Clinton, the frontrunner to win the Democratic nomination, kicked off a long day of questioning with a plea that the United States maintain its global leadership role despite the threat posed to US diplomats. She hailed the efforts of the four Americans who died in the September 11, 2012 attacks, including the first ambassador in more than three decades, but told the House Benghazi Committee that the deadly events had already been exhaustively scrutinized.
The hearing comes at a moment of political strength for Clinton. On Wednesday, Vice President Joe Biden, a potential rival for the Democratic nomination, announced he would not be joining the race. Clinton is also riding the momentum of a solid debate performance last week. The Benghazi panel’s Republican chairman says he won’t call Clinton to appear a second time.
But Trey Gowdy of South Carolina started the hearing with a series of questions that he said remained unanswered: Why was the US in Libya, why were security requests denied, why was the military not ready to respond quickly on the 11th anniversary of 9/11 and why did the Obama administration change its story about the nature of the attacks in the weeks afterward?
Clinton addressed some of these matters in her opening remarks. She stressed a need for diplomats to advance US interests in the world, even in dangerous places, and said perfect security can never be achieved.
The committee’s top Democrat, Elijah Cummings of Maryland, described the probe as a partisan campaign replete with conspiracy theories.
The Republican criticism has included contentions by some lawmakers that Clinton personally denied security requests and ordered the US military to “stand down” during the attacks, or that her agency was engaged in an elaborate gun-running scheme in eastern Libya. None of these was substantiated in the independent Accountability Review Board investigation ordered by Clinton and seven subsequent congressional investigations.
Gowdy is engaged in his own balancing act, portraying the panel as focused on the facts after comments by fellow Republicans describing the inquiry as an effort designed to hurt Clinton’s presidential bid. Democrats have pounced on the remarks, and pointed out that the probe has now cost US taxpayers more than US$4.5 million and, after 17 months, has lasted longer than the 1970s Watergate investigation that brought down Richard Nixon.
Yesterday’s hearing was expected to last the whole day and Clinton was certain to face questions about her use of a private e-mail account and server while serving as President Barack Obama’s chief diplomat.
A new AP-Gfk poll shows the public mixed on Clinton and Benghazi. Four in 10 say they neither approve nor disapprove of how she has answered questions about the attack, while 20 percent approve and 37 percent disapprove.
They are also divided on Clinton’s e-mails, which have raised security concerns. More than half of those polled view use of a private server as a minor problem or no problem at all.
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 沪ICP证：沪ICP备05050403号-1
- |
- 互联网新闻信息服务许可证：31120180004
- |
- 网络视听许可证：0909346
- |
- 广播电视节目制作许可证：沪字第354号
- |
- 增值电信业务经营许可证：沪B2-20120012
Copyright © 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
