Related News
Court criticizes Ireland's abortion ban
Source: Agencies |
December 17, 2010, Friday
|
Print Edition
Print Edition
IRELAND'S constitutional ban on abortion violates the rights of pregnant women to receive proper medical care in life-threatening cases, the European Court of Human Rights ruled yesterday in a judgment that harshly criticized Ireland's long inaction on the issue.
The judgment from the Strasbourg, France-based court will put Ireland under pressure to draft a law extending limited abortion rights to women whose pregnancies represent a potentially fatal threat to their own health.
Ireland has resisted taking that step despite a 1992 judgment from the Irish Supreme Court declaring that abortions should be considered legal in Ireland in all cases where the woman's life would be endangered by continued pregnancy - including through threats to commit suicide. The delay has left the abortion rights of thousands of women in legal limbo, obliging many to travel overseas for the procedure.
The Strasbourg judges said Ireland was wrong to keep the legal situation unclear for women who received a doctor's advice that their pregnancy could complicate their own medical problems.
They ruled in favor of one of three litigants who sued Ireland for allegedly failing to protect their rights to health and well-being under terms of the European Convention on Human Rights.
The successful litigant is a Lithuanian woman living in Ireland who, at the time of her pregnancy, was successfully battling cancer through chemotherapy and feared that her pregnancy would trigger a relapse of the disease. She testified that her doctors agreed, but none was willing to authorize an abortion.
She had to travel to England for an abortion. The European judges ruled she should have received an abortion in Ireland as a matter of medical urgency.
They ruled against two other litigants: one a woman who didn't want to be a single mother, another who had four other children placed in state care. Judges said both women failed to show their pregnancies represented a risk to their health.
The judgment from the Strasbourg, France-based court will put Ireland under pressure to draft a law extending limited abortion rights to women whose pregnancies represent a potentially fatal threat to their own health.
Ireland has resisted taking that step despite a 1992 judgment from the Irish Supreme Court declaring that abortions should be considered legal in Ireland in all cases where the woman's life would be endangered by continued pregnancy - including through threats to commit suicide. The delay has left the abortion rights of thousands of women in legal limbo, obliging many to travel overseas for the procedure.
The Strasbourg judges said Ireland was wrong to keep the legal situation unclear for women who received a doctor's advice that their pregnancy could complicate their own medical problems.
They ruled in favor of one of three litigants who sued Ireland for allegedly failing to protect their rights to health and well-being under terms of the European Convention on Human Rights.
The successful litigant is a Lithuanian woman living in Ireland who, at the time of her pregnancy, was successfully battling cancer through chemotherapy and feared that her pregnancy would trigger a relapse of the disease. She testified that her doctors agreed, but none was willing to authorize an abortion.
She had to travel to England for an abortion. The European judges ruled she should have received an abortion in Ireland as a matter of medical urgency.
They ruled against two other litigants: one a woman who didn't want to be a single mother, another who had four other children placed in state care. Judges said both women failed to show their pregnancies represented a risk to their health.
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 娌狪CP璇侊細娌狪CP澶05050403鍙-1
- |
- 浜掕仈缃戞柊闂讳俊鎭湇鍔¤鍙瘉锛31120180004
- |
- 缃戠粶瑙嗗惉璁稿彲璇侊細0909346
- |
- 骞挎挱鐢佃鑺傜洰鍒朵綔璁稿彲璇侊細娌瓧绗354鍙
- |
- 澧炲肩數淇′笟鍔＄粡钀ヨ鍙瘉锛氭勃B2-20120012
Copyright 漏 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
