The story appears on

Page A9

January 14, 2011

GET this page in PDF

Free for subscribers

View shopping cart

Related News

Home » World

Criticism of Palin's 'blood libel'

WHEN Sarah Palin accused journalists and pundits of "blood libel" in the wake of the Arizona shootings, she reached deep into one of medieval history's most sordid chapters to make her point.

The term "blood libel" is not well known, but it is highly charged - a direct reference to a time when many European Christians accused Jews of kidnapping and murdering Christian children to obtain their blood. Jews were tortured and executed for crimes they did not commit, emblematic of anti-Semitism so virulent that some scholars recoiled on Wednesday at Palin's use of the term.

In a video posted to her Facebook page early Wednesday, the 2008 Republican vice presidential candidate accused the American media of inciting hatred and violence after the shooting that wounded Representative Gabrielle Giffords. Palin has been criticized for marking Giffords' district with the cross hairs of a gun sight during last fall's campaign.

"But, especially within hours of a tragedy unfolding, journalists and pundits should not manufacture a blood libel that serves only to incite the very hatred and violence they purport to condemn. That is reprehensible," she said.

Some experts on the history of blood libel criticized Palin's use of the term.

"In her own thinking, I just don't understand the logical use of this word," said Ronnie Hsia, a professor of history at Pennsylvania State University who has written two books about blood libel. "I think it's inappropriate and I frankly think if she or her staff know about the meaning of this word, I think it's insulting to the Jewish people."

Said Jerome Chanes, a research fellow at the Center for Jewish Studies at the City University of New York: "It's a classic case of, I don't know what you want to call it, semantic corruption."

Blood libel dates back to the 12th century in Europe, when many Christians believed that Jews killed children for supposed rituals including re-enacting the crucifixion of Christ, historians say. According to the belief, Jews would torture and kill the children and use their blood, often to make matzoh, the "bread of affliction" that is central to celebrating the Jewish holiday of Passover.





 

Copyright © 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.

沪公网安备 31010602000204号

Email this to your friend