Lawyer says one-line bill could be put to parliament on Brexit
Print Edition
THE British government will need to put forward a parliamentary bill to trigger formal European Union divorce talks should it lose a Supreme Court fight over who can start the Brexit process, a government lawyer said yesterday.
However, this could be just a one-line piece of legislation, James Eadie added — an option which could limit anti-Brexit lawmakers’ ability to delay the process or water down government policies on the terms of the EU exit.
“It would require not just parliamentary involvement ... but primary legislation,” Eadie told the Supreme Court.
“The reason it requires primary legislation is (because) you are being asked to declare ... unlawful the exercise of the prerogative power to give Article 50 notice as the first step in the process,” he told the 11 judges.
He was referring to an executive power known as “prerogative” which, under Britain’s unwritten constitution, allows the government to take certain actions without going through parliament.
“If the Supreme Court decides against our arguments here then the solution in legal terms is a one-line act,” Eadie said on day two of a four-day hearing.
“Maybe that would lead to all sorts of parliamentary complication and possible additions and amendments and so on, but that’s the solution.”
The government is appealing against a High Court ruling last month that it could not invoke Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty, which begins a two-year exit process, without parliamentary assent.
Prerogative power
Eadie said by giving approval for June’s referendum on whether Britain should leave the EU, parliament had accepted that Article 50 would have to be triggered in the event of a “leave” vote as that was the only way to implement the result.
Britons voted for Brexit by 52 to 48 percent and the government has said this mandated it to begin the divorce process using the prerogative power.
British judges are not supposed to compel parliament to legislate, and Eadie said this was what the Supreme Court was being asked to do. Noting that there had already been several debates about Brexit in parliament, including one called by the opposition Labour Party, Eadie said lawmakers had not called for primary legislation to trigger Article 50 during those debates.
“Parliament does not seem to want the obligation that the (High Court) has thrust upon them,” he said.
There had been speculation that in the wake of a Supreme Court defeat Prime Minister Theresa May might seek to get lawmakers’ approval by a parliamentary motion which could be brought forward quickly and avoid the detailed scrutiny that a new bill might elicit.
Investors believe that greater parliamentary involvement would reduce the chances of a “hard Brexit” in which tight controls on immigration are prioritized over European single market access.
May is facing a rebellion from her own lawmakers today when parliament debates whether the government should set out its Brexit plan before triggering Article 50.
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 沪ICP证：沪ICP备05050403号-1
- |
- 互联网新闻信息服务许可证：31120180004
- |
- 网络视听许可证：0909346
- |
- 广播电视节目制作许可证：沪字第354号
- |
- 增值电信业务经营许可证：沪B2-20120012
Copyright © 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
