The story appears on

Page A12

September 14, 2016

GET this page in PDF

Free for subscribers

View shopping cart

Related News

HomeWorld

Scientists claim eggs not needed for embryo

WE all grow up to accept certain unassailable facts: water is wet, the Earth is round, and to produce a baby you need an egg and sperm. As it turns out, the last of these may turn out not to be true.

Yesterday, scientists announced they had produced baby mice by fusing sperm and a type of cell that is not an egg. The pups that survived this alchemy were healthy, with normal lifespans, and able to procreate the traditional way, researchers from Britain and Germany reported in the journal Nature Communications.

“It had been thought that only an egg cell was capable of reprogramming sperm to allow embryonic development to take place,” Tony Perry of the University of Bath and the senior author of the report said.

“Our work challenges the dogma, held since early embryologists first observed mammalian eggs around 1827 and observed fertilization 50 years later, that only an egg cell fertilized with a sperm cell can result in a live mammalian birth.”

There are two types of cell: “meiotic” reproductive cells, and “mitotic” cells which include most of the tissues and organs in our bodies. Mammal reproduction requires a sperm and egg to fuse, creating an embryo. But instead of using a meiotic egg cell to produce their mouse pups, the researchers used a type of mitotic cell called a parthenogenote.


 

Copyright 漏 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.

娌叕缃戝畨澶 31010602000204鍙

Email this to your friend