Home
News
In Focus
Business
Metro
Nation
World
Sports
Feature
Opinion
View more »Opinion Columns
Wan LixinOpinion deputy editor of Shanghai Daily
Restaurants get off to a quick start thanks to game-changing policies
High service charges on event ticket refunds call for further regulation
Sunday
- Subscribe
Related News
UK needsto accept intercept evidence
Source: Agencies |
September 9, 2009, Wednesday
|
Print Edition
Print Edition
THE case against an al-Qaida gang that plotted to bring down trans-Atlantic aircraft proves that wiretaps and other intercept evidence should be allowed in British courts, Britain's former chief prosecutor said yesterday.
Three British Muslims were convicted on Monday of plotting to murder thousands by downing planes using liquid explosives hidden in soda bottles.
The investigation involved one of the biggest and most expensive surveillance operations in British history. But it took two trials to secure convictions because juries could not be told of all the evidence against the men.
A jury at an earlier trial last year could not decide whether the defendants had plotted to blow up aircraft. The second trial introduced new evidence, including e-mails between the plotters and contacts in Pakistan that were provided by the United States.
Britain is one of the few countries to bar the use of evidence from intercepted personal phone calls, e-mails, letters and faxes. Intelligence agencies have resisted attempts to allow such evidence, fearing it would expose their techniques to public scrutiny.
Such evidence is used effectively in many countries, including the US, said Ken Macdonald, the former Director of Public Prosecutions.
It is "the best evidence you can have, people convicting themselves out of their own mouths," he told the BBC.
Three British Muslims were convicted on Monday of plotting to murder thousands by downing planes using liquid explosives hidden in soda bottles.
The investigation involved one of the biggest and most expensive surveillance operations in British history. But it took two trials to secure convictions because juries could not be told of all the evidence against the men.
A jury at an earlier trial last year could not decide whether the defendants had plotted to blow up aircraft. The second trial introduced new evidence, including e-mails between the plotters and contacts in Pakistan that were provided by the United States.
Britain is one of the few countries to bar the use of evidence from intercepted personal phone calls, e-mails, letters and faxes. Intelligence agencies have resisted attempts to allow such evidence, fearing it would expose their techniques to public scrutiny.
Such evidence is used effectively in many countries, including the US, said Ken Macdonald, the former Director of Public Prosecutions.
It is "the best evidence you can have, people convicting themselves out of their own mouths," he told the BBC.
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 沪ICP证：沪ICP备05050403号-1
- |
- 互联网新闻信息服务许可证：31120180004
- |
- 网络视听许可证：0909346
- |
- 广播电视节目制作许可证：沪字第354号
- |
- 增值电信业务经营许可证：沪B2-20120012
Copyright © 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
