Related News
UK's expenses scandal forces Commons speaker to resign
THE speaker of Britain's House of Commons resigned yesterday because of a backlash over excessive expense claims by politicians, marking the first time in three centuries a speaker has been forced out of office.
Though Michael Martin has not been caught up in recent revelations about expenses - reimbursements for chandeliers, moat cleaning and mortgage payments have outraged taxpayers - he was blamed for creating a climate in which such excesses were allowed.
In an extremely short statement to the House of Commons, Martin said he would leave the post on June 21 to maintain "unity" in Parliament's lower chamber. "This will allow the house to proceed to elect a new speaker," Martin said. "This is all I have to say on this matter."
He then moved on to other parliamentary business.
Martin resisted reforms designed to make politicians' expenses more transparent and fought to block publication of the expense claims.
But Members of Parliament themselves have been reluctant to expose their sometimes lavish spending, and Martin's defenders said he was taking the fall for their avarice.
The announcement came a day after Martin ignored calls to resign, invoking parliamentary procedure to stall debate on a motion of no confidence intended to force him out.
MPs, normally respectful of the speaker, had to be called to order repeatedly by Martin as he tried to make himself heard.
Martin's replacement will be elected by the 646 politicians in the Commons the day after he steps down.
The new speaker will take over a position steeped in history and entrusted with the running of the House of Commons.
The speaker keeps order during debates, decides which MPs are called on to speak and represents the chamber in discussions with Queen Elizabeth II and the House of Lords.
The last speaker to be forced from his position was Sir John Trevor, found guilty of accepting a bribe in 1695.
Rodney Barker, a professor of government at the London School of Economics, said Martin's departure showed Parliament was taking reform seriously.
"It won't solve anything at all, but if his successor could appear to be taking charge of things in a way that implements proper procedures, probity, and decent use of public money, that would be the very opposite of Michael Martin's position," Barker said.
"He has been seen as a supporter of the most greedy and the most mean."
Martin was elected as Labour MP for a Glasgow constituency in 1979 and became speaker in 2000.
Though Michael Martin has not been caught up in recent revelations about expenses - reimbursements for chandeliers, moat cleaning and mortgage payments have outraged taxpayers - he was blamed for creating a climate in which such excesses were allowed.
In an extremely short statement to the House of Commons, Martin said he would leave the post on June 21 to maintain "unity" in Parliament's lower chamber. "This will allow the house to proceed to elect a new speaker," Martin said. "This is all I have to say on this matter."
He then moved on to other parliamentary business.
Martin resisted reforms designed to make politicians' expenses more transparent and fought to block publication of the expense claims.
But Members of Parliament themselves have been reluctant to expose their sometimes lavish spending, and Martin's defenders said he was taking the fall for their avarice.
The announcement came a day after Martin ignored calls to resign, invoking parliamentary procedure to stall debate on a motion of no confidence intended to force him out.
MPs, normally respectful of the speaker, had to be called to order repeatedly by Martin as he tried to make himself heard.
Martin's replacement will be elected by the 646 politicians in the Commons the day after he steps down.
The new speaker will take over a position steeped in history and entrusted with the running of the House of Commons.
The speaker keeps order during debates, decides which MPs are called on to speak and represents the chamber in discussions with Queen Elizabeth II and the House of Lords.
The last speaker to be forced from his position was Sir John Trevor, found guilty of accepting a bribe in 1695.
Rodney Barker, a professor of government at the London School of Economics, said Martin's departure showed Parliament was taking reform seriously.
"It won't solve anything at all, but if his successor could appear to be taking charge of things in a way that implements proper procedures, probity, and decent use of public money, that would be the very opposite of Michael Martin's position," Barker said.
"He has been seen as a supporter of the most greedy and the most mean."
Martin was elected as Labour MP for a Glasgow constituency in 1979 and became speaker in 2000.
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
- RSS
- |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 沪ICP证:沪ICP备05050403号-1
- |
- 互联网新闻信息服务许可证:31120180004
- |
- 网络视听许可证:0909346
- |
- 广播电视节目制作许可证:沪字第354号
- |
- 增值电信业务经营许可证:沪B2-20120012
Copyright © 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.