Home
News
In Focus
Business
Metro
Nation
World
Sports
Feature
Opinion
View more 禄Opinion Columns
Wan LixinOpinion deputy editor of Shanghai Daily
City-born architect lists inspiration behind his designs in a new book
Digitization helps preserve, disseminate intangible cultural heritage
Sunday
- Subscribe
US judge rejects emerald claims
Source: Agencies |
April 14, 2011, Thursday
|
Print Edition
Print Edition
A JUDGE tentatively rejected a California businessman's claim to a 381-kilogram emerald, saying his story about paying Brazilian miners US$60,000 for the gigantic gem that was later stolen was simply not credible.
Superior Court Judge John A Kronstadt in Los Angeles said in a 48-page ruling that it appeared Tony Thomas changed his testimony throughout the trial to improve his chances of prevailing, and that many of his assertions simply defied logic.
Among them, the judge said, was his statement that he had no proof of ownership because someone deliberately burned his Morgan Hill house to the ground to destroy his only copy of the bill of sale.
"The court did not find Thomas to be a credible witness on these key points," Kronstadt said in the ruling issued last Friday in the lawsuit by Thomas.
The judge said he would not make his ruling final until giving Thomas a reasonable time to lodge any objections. He didn't provide a deadline.
Even if Thomas objects, the question of who owns the Bahia Emerald, with an appraised value of up to US$900 million, is far from resolved.
Two other competing claims remain, and Kronstadt said he would take those up later. The Bahia, one of the world's largest emeralds, has had a long, circuitous journey since Thomas had himself photographed with it in a carport in Brazil in 2001.
During a trial that began last September and was delayed several times, Thomas testified that he paid US$60,000 to the Brazilian miners who dug it up.
Superior Court Judge John A Kronstadt in Los Angeles said in a 48-page ruling that it appeared Tony Thomas changed his testimony throughout the trial to improve his chances of prevailing, and that many of his assertions simply defied logic.
Among them, the judge said, was his statement that he had no proof of ownership because someone deliberately burned his Morgan Hill house to the ground to destroy his only copy of the bill of sale.
"The court did not find Thomas to be a credible witness on these key points," Kronstadt said in the ruling issued last Friday in the lawsuit by Thomas.
The judge said he would not make his ruling final until giving Thomas a reasonable time to lodge any objections. He didn't provide a deadline.
Even if Thomas objects, the question of who owns the Bahia Emerald, with an appraised value of up to US$900 million, is far from resolved.
Two other competing claims remain, and Kronstadt said he would take those up later. The Bahia, one of the world's largest emeralds, has had a long, circuitous journey since Thomas had himself photographed with it in a carport in Brazil in 2001.
During a trial that began last September and was delayed several times, Thomas testified that he paid US$60,000 to the Brazilian miners who dug it up.
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 娌狪CP璇侊細娌狪CP澶05050403鍙-1
- |
- 浜掕仈缃戞柊闂讳俊鎭湇鍔¤鍙瘉锛31120180004
- |
- 缃戠粶瑙嗗惉璁稿彲璇侊細0909346
- |
- 骞挎挱鐢佃鑺傜洰鍒朵綔璁稿彲璇侊細娌瓧绗354鍙
- |
- 澧炲肩數淇′笟鍔＄粡钀ヨ鍙瘉锛氭勃B2-20120012
Copyright 漏 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
