Related News
US ships must post guards if sailing off Somalia
Source: Agencies |
May 13, 2009, Wednesday
|
Online Edition
Online Edition
THE US Coast Guard will require US-flagged ships sailing around the Horn of Africa to post guards and ship owners to submit anti-piracy security plans for approval, a Coast Guard official said yesterday.
The new requirements, which respond to a surge of piracy off the coast of Somalia, allow ship owners to decide whether to use armed or unarmed guards, Coast Guard Rear Admiral James Watson told shipping industry representatives at a maritime security meeting in Fort Lauderdale, Florida.
The revised Maritime Security Directive, highly anticipated by the shipping industry, was signed on Monday by Coast Guard Commandant Thad Allen.
"We expect to see additional security on US-flagged vessels that transit these waters," said Watson, the Coast Guard's director of prevention policy.
"It can involve the use of firearms," he said, but added, "We are looking for things that work but that don't make the situation worse."
The requirement to post guards applies only to ships sailing off the Horn of Africa, but the owners of all US-flagged ships must submit security plans to the Coast Guard within two weeks, Watson said.
"They're going to tell us what they propose," and then the Coast Guard will give thumbs up or thumbs down, Watson said.
He said the directive does not dictate how many guards must be posted on each vessel, or what type of training they must have. He said the Coast Guard would work with ship owners whose plans are deemed inadequate to fend off pirate attacks.
"We're not interested in putting ships out of business," he said.
The piracy off the coast of Somalia included an attack against the US-flagged container ship Maersk Alabama last month. The ship's captain, Richard Phillips, was freed four days later when US commandos shot and killed three pirates.
Arming cargo ships has been a sensitive issue because some countries will not allow armed vessels to enter their ports. Additionally, arming the ships can raise liability issues and increase insurance costs.
Some ship owners fear it could cause misunderstandings to escalate into gunfights, noting for example that fishermen off Yemen sometimes fire their automatic rifles into the air to warn other vessels away from their nets.
US-flagged ships that carry military cargo already are armed, Watson said.
The US State Department is working with countries in pirate-plagued regions to learn what weapons laws apply in their ports in order to clarify the issue for US mariners.
It may also try to negotiate agreements allowing armed US ships to enter those countries' ports, said Donna Hopkins, of the State Department's political and military planning and policy division.
Asked if that meant the United States would allow armed foreign vessels in its ports, Hopkins said, "Diplomacy is based on the principle of reciprocity ... that certainly is going to be part of the debate."
Watson said the new directive would not be publicly released in its entirety because it contained sensitive security information.
But at the urging of shipping officials at the conference, he said a scrubbed version might be released to help shipping companies learn good security measures from each other.
"It's the actual security that's on a particular vessel that we want to keep close-held," Watson said.
The new requirements, which respond to a surge of piracy off the coast of Somalia, allow ship owners to decide whether to use armed or unarmed guards, Coast Guard Rear Admiral James Watson told shipping industry representatives at a maritime security meeting in Fort Lauderdale, Florida.
The revised Maritime Security Directive, highly anticipated by the shipping industry, was signed on Monday by Coast Guard Commandant Thad Allen.
"We expect to see additional security on US-flagged vessels that transit these waters," said Watson, the Coast Guard's director of prevention policy.
"It can involve the use of firearms," he said, but added, "We are looking for things that work but that don't make the situation worse."
The requirement to post guards applies only to ships sailing off the Horn of Africa, but the owners of all US-flagged ships must submit security plans to the Coast Guard within two weeks, Watson said.
"They're going to tell us what they propose," and then the Coast Guard will give thumbs up or thumbs down, Watson said.
He said the directive does not dictate how many guards must be posted on each vessel, or what type of training they must have. He said the Coast Guard would work with ship owners whose plans are deemed inadequate to fend off pirate attacks.
"We're not interested in putting ships out of business," he said.
The piracy off the coast of Somalia included an attack against the US-flagged container ship Maersk Alabama last month. The ship's captain, Richard Phillips, was freed four days later when US commandos shot and killed three pirates.
Arming cargo ships has been a sensitive issue because some countries will not allow armed vessels to enter their ports. Additionally, arming the ships can raise liability issues and increase insurance costs.
Some ship owners fear it could cause misunderstandings to escalate into gunfights, noting for example that fishermen off Yemen sometimes fire their automatic rifles into the air to warn other vessels away from their nets.
US-flagged ships that carry military cargo already are armed, Watson said.
The US State Department is working with countries in pirate-plagued regions to learn what weapons laws apply in their ports in order to clarify the issue for US mariners.
It may also try to negotiate agreements allowing armed US ships to enter those countries' ports, said Donna Hopkins, of the State Department's political and military planning and policy division.
Asked if that meant the United States would allow armed foreign vessels in its ports, Hopkins said, "Diplomacy is based on the principle of reciprocity ... that certainly is going to be part of the debate."
Watson said the new directive would not be publicly released in its entirety because it contained sensitive security information.
But at the urging of shipping officials at the conference, he said a scrubbed version might be released to help shipping companies learn good security measures from each other.
"It's the actual security that's on a particular vessel that we want to keep close-held," Watson said.
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 娌狪CP璇侊細娌狪CP澶05050403鍙-1
- |
- 浜掕仈缃戞柊闂讳俊鎭湇鍔¤鍙瘉锛31120180004
- |
- 缃戠粶瑙嗗惉璁稿彲璇侊細0909346
- |
- 骞挎挱鐢佃鑺傜洰鍒朵綔璁稿彲璇侊細娌瓧绗354鍙
- |
- 澧炲肩數淇′笟鍔＄粡钀ヨ鍙瘉锛氭勃B2-20120012
Copyright 漏 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
