Victory for free speech in India
Print Edition
India鈥檚 top court yesterday affirmed people鈥檚 right to free speech in cyberspace by striking down a provision that had called for imprisoning people who send 鈥渙ffensive鈥 messages by computer or cellphone.
The provision, known as Section 66A of the 2008 Information Technology Act, had made sending such messages a crime punishable by up to three years in prison.
In its ruling, the Supreme Court said the provision was 鈥渃learly vague鈥 in not clarifying what should be construed as offensive. It also said the provision violates people鈥檚 freedom of speech and their right to share information.
鈥淭he public鈥檚 right to know is directly affected,鈥 the judges said in deeming the provision unconstitutional.
The Supreme Court did, however, upheld a provision in the law that allows the government to block websites without explanation.
Law student Shreya Singhal, who filed the challenge in 2012, applauded the court鈥檚 rejection of a provision she said was 鈥済rossly offensive to our rights, our freedom of speech and expression.鈥
鈥淭oday the Supreme Court has upheld that, they have supported our rights,鈥 she said. 鈥淚 am ecstatic.鈥
The law has been invoked in at least 10 recent cases, most often involving criticism of political leaders.
In 2012, a chemistry professor and his neighbor in Kolkata were arrested for forwarding a cartoon that made fun of West Bengal鈥檚 top elected official.
Police arrested a man last year for saying on Facebook that Prime Minister Narendra Modi, then still a candidate, would start a holocaust in India if elected to office.
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 娌狪CP璇侊細娌狪CP澶05050403鍙-1
- |
- 浜掕仈缃戞柊闂讳俊鎭湇鍔¤鍙瘉锛31120180004
- |
- 缃戠粶瑙嗗惉璁稿彲璇侊細0909346
- |
- 骞挎挱鐢佃鑺傜洰鍒朵綔璁稿彲璇侊細娌瓧绗354鍙
- |
- 澧炲肩數淇′笟鍔＄粡钀ヨ鍙瘉锛氭勃B2-20120012
Copyright 漏 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
