WHO 'performed well' on H1N1
March 11, 2011, Friday
|
Print Edition
Print Edition
INDEPENDENT experts who examined the World Health Organization's handling of the H1N1 pandemic said yesterday they had found no evidence of drug industry influence on the UN agency's decision-making in the crisis.
But in a draft report made public, the panel said WHO had failed to recognize and manage conflicts of interest among some experts on its advisory Emergency Committee who had disclosed their ties to pharmaceutical companies.
The world remains "ill-prepared" to face a severe influenza pandemic or similar public health emergency, the experts added.
The United Nations agency announced in June 2009 that the newly emerged H1N1 swine flu virus was causing the world's first influenza pandemic in more than 40 years. It declared the pandemic over in August 2010, saying that the global outbreak had turned out to be much less severe than was feared.
"WHO performed well in many ways during the pandemic and confronted systemic difficulties and demonstrated some shortcomings," the panel said in a 33-page report. "The Committee found no evidence of malfeasance."
"As far as the Review Committee can determine, no critic of WHO has produced any direct evidence of commercial influence on decision-making," it added.
But in a draft report made public, the panel said WHO had failed to recognize and manage conflicts of interest among some experts on its advisory Emergency Committee who had disclosed their ties to pharmaceutical companies.
The world remains "ill-prepared" to face a severe influenza pandemic or similar public health emergency, the experts added.
The United Nations agency announced in June 2009 that the newly emerged H1N1 swine flu virus was causing the world's first influenza pandemic in more than 40 years. It declared the pandemic over in August 2010, saying that the global outbreak had turned out to be much less severe than was feared.
"WHO performed well in many ways during the pandemic and confronted systemic difficulties and demonstrated some shortcomings," the panel said in a 33-page report. "The Committee found no evidence of malfeasance."
"As far as the Review Committee can determine, no critic of WHO has produced any direct evidence of commercial influence on decision-making," it added.
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 娌狪CP璇侊細娌狪CP澶05050403鍙-1
- |
- 浜掕仈缃戞柊闂讳俊鎭湇鍔¤鍙瘉锛31120180004
- |
- 缃戠粶瑙嗗惉璁稿彲璇侊細0909346
- |
- 骞挎挱鐢佃鑺傜洰鍒朵綔璁稿彲璇侊細娌瓧绗354鍙
- |
- 澧炲肩數淇′笟鍔＄粡钀ヨ鍙瘉锛氭勃B2-20120012
Copyright 漏 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
