Category: Federal Elections / Superannuation / Government and Politics / Federal Government
What are the Government's proposed super changes?
Saturday, 4 Jun 2016 06:18:19 | Dan Conifer

Super concessions are set to cost the budget almost $30 billion this financial year. (Alan Porritt: AAP)
The Government is still under fire over superannuation changes it announced over a month ago in its budget.
Labor has strongly attacked one measure — a cap on after-tax contributions — as retrospective.
But what are the changes that have attracted controversy? And would they affect you?
What is superannuation?
Superannuation is money workers save for their retirement.
Currently, employers must pay at least 9.5 per cent of your salary into a super fund.
For most people, superannuation is taxed at a lower rate than wages or other investments.
Here is what you need to know about the Government's superannuation concessions.
What are the basic rules?
Most people pay a 15 per cent tax on super contributions (money going in) — up to 30 cents in the dollar below individual income tax rates.
For people in the retirement phase — generally 60 years or over and permanently retired — earnings and payments are currently tax free.
What has the Government proposed? Would it affect you?
Superannuation concessions are set to cost the federal budget almost $30 billion this financial year.
Revenue measures
The Government has estimated its revenue measures would reap $6 billion over four years.
It said the changes would only affect 4 per cent of superannuation account holders.
About 14 million Australians are super account holders — which means more than 550,000 Australians would be impacted.
However, the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia estimated it could affect up to 1.25 million people.
$1.6 million retirement account limit
People with retirement phase accounts currently pay no tax on superannuation earnings, that is the profits from their investments.
The Government would cap these retirement accounts at $1.6 million, starting value. This pool of money would continue to grow tax-free.
Anything above $1.6 million — for current or future retirees — would go into another account, with profits taxed at 15 per cent. Alternatively, the money could be withdrawn and invested elsewhere.
The Government said this would affect less than 1 per cent of superannuation fund members.
This measure would reap $2 billion over four years, partly reversing the tax-free status retirement accounts were given by the Howard government.
$500,000 non-concessional contributions cap
There is currently a $180,000 a year limit on after-tax contributions, which is the extra money you put into super from your wages after paying income tax.
The Government would change this to a $500,000 lifetime cap. This rule would take into account all after-tax contributions from mid-2007 onwards.
People who have already contributed more than $500,000 would not be penalised.
The budget predicts the measure would reap $550 million over four years.
The Government said it would affect 42,000, or less than about one in 300 account holders.
Transition to Retirement Income Stream
The scheme allows people aged 56-64, who are still working, to access some of their superannuation early. It allows people to maintain their income but reduce their hours, encouraging workforce participation.
Earnings in transition accounts are currently tax free.
Under the Government's changes, earnings within the fund would be taxed at 15 per cent.
The Productivity Commission estimates the change would impact about 115,000 people.
The policy would raise an estimated $640 million over four years.
Reducing cap for pre-tax contributions to $25,000
Currently people can put a maximum of $35,000 a year into their superannuation accounts at a concessional tax rate, generally 15 per cent. For example, through their compulsory contribution and salary sacrificing.
The Government would reduce this to $25,000 with the measure expected to raise $2.5 billion over the forward estimates period.
The Government said 600,000 account holders would be impacted.
Spending measures
The Government said it is reinvesting about $3 billion to make superannuation fairer.
Low Income Superannuation Tax Offset
The Government is retaining a superannuation tax offset for low income earners, giving people a tax refund of up to $500 annually.
This is to make sure they do not pay more tax on super than they would on their income.
The offset was a Labor policy, which the Coalition previously opposed and would hit the budget by $1.6 billion over four years.
Catch-up superannuation contributions
The Government would also allow people to catch-up on concessional contributions if they did not reach the proposed $25,000 a year cap.
This would see the cap rollover for up to five years, allowing people to contribute up to $125,000 over five years. This would apply to people with super balances below $500,000.
This would cost the budget $350 million over the forward estimates.
Contributions from self-employed and other non-wage earners
The Government would also allow all working individuals, for example tradespeople and other individual contractors, to make concessional contributions where some previously could not.
This is estimated to cost $1 billion over four years.
What does Labor say?
The Opposition's flagship policies are similar to the Government's policies, and it supports fixing unfairness at the top end of the system.
However, the Australian Labor Party (ALP) has been strongly critical of the $500,000 non-concessional contribution cap, slamming the move as retrospective.
"The things we have the biggest concerns with are the retrospective elements of some of these measures. That measure, the $500,000 limit, is backdated to 2007. That's retrospective," ALP superannuation spokesman Jim Chalmers said.
Labor outlined its super policy last year.
It would tax retirement phase earnings above $75,000 at 15 per cent. Labor said its proposal, costed by the Parliamentary Budget Office, would raise $14 billion over a decade.
The effect of this plan is similar to the Government's $1.6 million retirement account limit.
The ALP would also charge high income earners 30 per cent tax on contributions after their annual income, including super, passes $250,000.
The Government has matched this policy in the budget.
Labor will also support the Government's Low Income Superannuation Tax Offset threshold — a policy it has long held. But the party said it is still consulting on other measures in the budget.
This article includes interactive context annotations which are not supported on this platform.
For the full interactive experience in this article, you will need a modern web browser with JavaScript enabled. Find out more about browser support at ABC News Online.
Negative gearing
Negative gearing allows property investors who make a loss on running their property to reduce the tax they pay on other income.
The Coalition parties have promised not to change the current negative gearing laws, which apply to established and new houses or apartments.
Labor wants to abolish negative gearing for established houses from next year, which it claims will make housing more affordable.
The Coalition has criticised Labor's plan, saying it would discourage investment, raise rents and reduce home values.
But Labor says its plan would help put first home buyers on a level playing field with investors.
Australia has more than two million property investors, and more than 60 per cent made a loss in the 2013-14 financial year.
The average loss is about $10,000.
If someone earned a wage of $80,000, for example, negative gearing would cut their taxable income to $70,000.
Marginal seats
A seat is described as "marginal" when the winning candidate from the last election won the seat by less than 6 per cent.
That means the candidate received less than 56 per cent of the two candidate preferred vote.
If a candidate wins 56-60 per cent, the seat is classified as "fairly safe", and over 60 per cent is considered "safe".
For a seat to change hands, a swing of anything more than an absolute majority (50 per cent + 1 vote) is required.
For example, if a member holds a seat with 56 per cent of the vote, a swing greater than 6 per cent is required for the seat to change hands.
Superannuation
Superannuation concessions are tax breaks designed to encourage people to put more money into superannuation, in theory saving the government money down the track by reducing the burden these people will place on the public purse when they retire.
Currently, superannuation is taxed at 15 per cent, with super earnings not taxed at all once you hit 60 years of age. Employers are required to put a minimum of 9.5 per cent of an employee's income into a super fund.
The superannuation concession allows people to voluntarily contribute more to their superannuation and still be taxed at the rate of 15 per cent (or 30 per cent if you are really well off), well below the majority of tax rates.
In the budget, the Government announced a lowering of the income threshold at which the 30 per cent (rather than 15 per cent) tax rate kicks in on superannuation contributions from $300,000 to $250,000, which matches one of Labor's policy commitments.
They also announced the lowering of the annual cap on contributions entitled to the concessional tax rates to $25,000, from the current $30,000 for under-50s and $35,000 for those aged 50-plus.
The two moves combined are expected to save a further $2.5 billion over three years.
Labor has promised it would raise $14 billion in a decade by putting a 15 per cent tax on super earnings more than $75,000 a year.
The concessions have been criticised for disproportionately benefiting the wealthy, who get a much bigger discount on their normal income tax rates than those in lower tax brackets.
With many wealthy people likely to be ineligible for the pension on reaching retirement anyway, critics argue that the concessions cost the government far more in lost revenue than it would cost to support wealthy individuals with the aged pension.
Superannuation concessions cost the federal budget $30 billion in 2015–16.
Gonski
The Gonski needs-based funding model was implemented under former prime minister Julia Gillard in 2014 following the independent Gonski review.
Under the model every student receives a base amount of funding with extra allocated for students with special needs or from disadvantaged backgrounds.
The Government has not matched the funding levels required by Gonski but has agreed to pump an extra $1.2 billion into schools, giving the states funding certainty until 2020.
The pledge partially reverses the 10-year, $30 billion cut to education funding contained in the Abbott government's 2014 budget.
Labor has promised to fully fund the last two years of Gonski at a cost of $4.5 billion.
The announcement was unveiled as part of a decade-long education plan from Labor worth $37.3 billion.
Backpacker tax
Currently, backpackers who come to Australia for work do not pay any tax until they earn more than $18,200.
In the 2015 budget, there was a proposal to tax backpackers on every dollar they earn from July 1, 2016.
By imposing this 32.5 per cent tax, the Government would earn $540 million over three years.
The Government has now delayed the introduction of the tax by six months until a government review on working holiday visas is complete.
That has angered farm groups, who argue they will be in the middle of harvest when any new taxes take effect.
Bill Shorten says it is cynical of the Government to delay the matter until after the election but Labor has not committed to scrapping the tax either.
The Greens want it dumped altogether.
Politicians and the farm sector agree that backpackers should pay some level of tax, but there is widespread concern that the proposed rate is too high.
The agriculture and tourism sectors say backpackers would bypass Australia and choose countries like New Zealand or Canada if the tax was implemented.
Backpackers make up 25 per cent of Australia's agriculture workforce.
In the Northern Territory, they make up 85 per cent.
Penalty rates
This election campaign is being fought under the shadow of a looming decision from the Fair Work Commission (FWC) which is deciding whether to cut Sunday penalty rates to the same level as Saturday rates.
If cut, around two million people who work in the retail and hospitality industries would be affected.
The Coalition has vowed to adhere to any ruling by the FWC that cuts Sunday penalty rates.
Labor does not want penalty rates cut but has ruled out passing legislation which would guarantee Sunday penalty rates if they win the election.
But if elected, Mr Shorten said a Labor government will make another submission to the commission arguing against the cuts.
The Australian Council of Trade Unions and the Greens want Labor to protect the Sunday penalties.
The FWC will hand down their decision after the July 2 election.
Preference deals
Australia has a preferential voting system, which means if you vote for a candidate who does not get elected your vote can go to the next preferred party.
Under new Senate voting laws passed in March, voters can number 1 to 6 on ballot papers above the line in order of their preference, or number individual candidates below the line.
The legislation's aim is to stop the complex preference-swapping deals that led to a number of senators being elected with only a fraction of the popular vote.
That is because instead of just voting for a preferred party above the line, often without knowing where their preferences have been directed, voters will now have to specify their choices.
The Liberal Party has not ruled out preferencing the Greens ahead of Labor in marginal Victorian seats.
If the July 2 election delivers another hung parliament, the Greens say they would prefer a Labor-Greens deal.
But both the Coalition and Labor have ruled out forming a governing Coalition with the Greens, raising the prospect of a second election if the first delivers a hung parliament.
Refoulement
Refoulement means the expulsion of persons who have the right to be recognised as refugees.
The United Nations Convention relating to the status of refugees outlines countries should not return a refugee to the place from which they fled because of their race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion.
This is regarded as the principle of non-refoulement.
Asylum seekers
The terms refugee and asylum seeker are often confused and wrongly used in place of the other.
An asylum seeker is someone who is seeking international protection, but has not yet had their claim for refugee status determined.
A refugee is someone who has been found to be requiring protection.
The UN Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees defines it as "... owing to well‐founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion, is outside the country of his nationality and is unable or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country; or who, not having a nationality and being outside the country of his former habitual residence as a result of such events, is unable or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to return to it."
MYEFO
The Mid-Year Economic and Fiscal Outlook is an update of the budget position around six months after the last budget was delivered.
PEFO
The purpose of the Pre-election Economic and Fiscal Outlook is to provide an update on the budget position in the lead up to the election, taking into account as many of the government decisions made before the election writs were issued.
It also outlines other factors which may be contributing to the economic situation the country finds itself in during the election period.
Medicare rebate freeze
In this year's budget, the Coalition announced it would continue the indexation freeze for all Medicare Benefit Schedule (MBS) fees until 2020.
While not a direct cut to GPs' income, over time GPs would earn relatively less while their costs would increase.
The freeze on rebates was initially put in place for four years in 2014 after the unpopular $7.00 GP co-payment was dropped.
The Opposition has criticised the rebate freeze, calling it a GP tax by stealth.
In the second week of the campaign, Opposition Leader Bill Shorten announced Labor's plans to restore indexation of the MBS from January 1, 2017.
Labor said it would cost $2.4 billion by 2019-20 and $12.2 billion over a decade.
Concessional loans
Concessional loans are provided on terms substantially more generous than market loans.
Below-interest rates or grace periods are often features of concessional loans.
During week three of the election campaign, Deputy Prime Minister Barnaby Joyce announced a $555-million package in concessional loans for dairy farmers affected by recent milk price cuts.
In 2014, the Coalition announced a drought concessional loan scheme which provides up to $150 million to drought-affected farm businesses.
Many farmers seeking drought loans have slammed the scheme for delayed access to funds and poor management.
Company tax cuts
The Coalition is proposing to cut the company tax rate to 25 per cent for all firms in the next 10 years.
The changes will be phased in over time, with an incremental increase in the number of firms paying the small business tax rate.
Eventually all firms, regardless of size, would pay 27.5 per cent, before the rate falls to 25 per cent from 2026-27.
The Federal Treasury predicts the measures would cost the budget more than $48 billion over a decade, while the Parliamentary Budget Office has estimated more than $51 billion.
The main argument for the proposal is that it would attract more foreign investment, producing a bigger and more productive economy.
Risks of the proposal include companies not increasing investment or taking a large profit instead of increasing employment or wages.
Labor is opposed to the proposal, saying Australia cannot afford the cuts, despite the Gillard government arguing for a cut five years ago.
Jobs and growth
The phrase "jobs and growth" has been widely recognised as the Coalition's catch-cry this election through the party's consistent repetition of the three-word slogan when selling their policies.
The mantra has been used to focus attention on the Coalition's plans to strengthen the economy including; corporate tax cuts, the innovation and science agenda and the Youth Employment Package.
Earlier this year, the Coalition rolled out the slogan "continuity and change" to try and graft their innovation policy to their traditional credentials in the economy.
However, the phrase was quickly killed off after the discovery that it was also a satirical line from the American sitcom, Veep.
In 2013, the Coalition chose the slogan "Choose Real Change. A Stronger Australia. A Better Future" to take to the election.
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS
- |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 沪ICP证:沪ICP备05050403号-1
- |
- 互联网新闻信息服务许可证:31120180004
- |
- 网络视听许可证:0909346
- |
- 广播电视节目制作许可证:沪字第354号
- |
- 增值电信业务经营许可证:沪B2-20120012
Copyright © 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.