Home » Opinion » Chinese Views
Rare earths defended
Source: Xinhua |
March 15, 2012, Thursday
|
Print Edition
Print Edition
RASH as it is, the United States' latest decision to enlist World Trade Organization (WTO) support against China's rare earth policy is based upon unfair accusations.
The United States, European Union and Japan have teamed up to bring a joint case against China to the WTO over alleged export controls on rare earths, which they claim are hurting domestic manufacturers.
The accusations, which stress that China's rare earth policies have restricted global supplies, can hardly hold up to scrutiny, with demand only filling around half the export quotas last year.
It's well recognized that rare earths, a class of 17 mineral elements, are one of the most sought-after metals for their vital roles in green technologies such as wind turbines and electric car batteries, and of particular concern, in military sectors.
Following the precedents set by the United States, nonrenewable resources of great strategic importance should not have been subject to free-trade theories when "national security" is concerned.
However, for decades, China has been feeding most of the world's demand for the metals. Excessive exploitation, antiquated mining technologies and previously lax environmental standards have taxed the country's environment.
Reckless exploitation
In some small towns in east China's Jiangxi Province, where reserves of precious ion-absorbed-type rare earths abound, reckless exploitation of the metals since the late 1980s has not only destroyed landscapes, but also poisoned streams and crops.
Therefore, China has adopted reasonable rare earth policies - implementing domestic production caps, export quotas, stricter environmental standards and resource taxes.
Pressing China to abandon these policies is like building a greener and cleaner future by exploiting China's environment.
As a rule, the WTO allows its members to take necessary measures to protect resources and environment, and considers it fair if export restraints are accompanied by simultaneous restrictions over domestic production or consumption.
Damaging the environment
China's policies, in line with the WTO rules, should not draw criticism. The fact is, although China now produces more than 90 percent of the world's rare earth supplies, it does not have all the deposits. Most nations with rare earth deposits, including the United States, closed their own mines decades ago and craved cheap supplies from China.
Rare-earth mining and processing is notoriously devastating to the environment, making it politically difficult for those countries to reopen the mines, which means China is still expected to contribute tremendously to rare earth supplies.
However, those undeniable truths are overlooked since tunnel vision only gives a view of unfair trading practices. Few if any trade issues have been as heated in the last several years as rare earths. It's predictable that the United States would raise the matter at a time of fierce election-year pressures at home.
The United States, European Union and Japan have teamed up to bring a joint case against China to the WTO over alleged export controls on rare earths, which they claim are hurting domestic manufacturers.
The accusations, which stress that China's rare earth policies have restricted global supplies, can hardly hold up to scrutiny, with demand only filling around half the export quotas last year.
It's well recognized that rare earths, a class of 17 mineral elements, are one of the most sought-after metals for their vital roles in green technologies such as wind turbines and electric car batteries, and of particular concern, in military sectors.
Following the precedents set by the United States, nonrenewable resources of great strategic importance should not have been subject to free-trade theories when "national security" is concerned.
However, for decades, China has been feeding most of the world's demand for the metals. Excessive exploitation, antiquated mining technologies and previously lax environmental standards have taxed the country's environment.
Reckless exploitation
In some small towns in east China's Jiangxi Province, where reserves of precious ion-absorbed-type rare earths abound, reckless exploitation of the metals since the late 1980s has not only destroyed landscapes, but also poisoned streams and crops.
Therefore, China has adopted reasonable rare earth policies - implementing domestic production caps, export quotas, stricter environmental standards and resource taxes.
Pressing China to abandon these policies is like building a greener and cleaner future by exploiting China's environment.
As a rule, the WTO allows its members to take necessary measures to protect resources and environment, and considers it fair if export restraints are accompanied by simultaneous restrictions over domestic production or consumption.
Damaging the environment
China's policies, in line with the WTO rules, should not draw criticism. The fact is, although China now produces more than 90 percent of the world's rare earth supplies, it does not have all the deposits. Most nations with rare earth deposits, including the United States, closed their own mines decades ago and craved cheap supplies from China.
Rare-earth mining and processing is notoriously devastating to the environment, making it politically difficult for those countries to reopen the mines, which means China is still expected to contribute tremendously to rare earth supplies.
However, those undeniable truths are overlooked since tunnel vision only gives a view of unfair trading practices. Few if any trade issues have been as heated in the last several years as rare earths. It's predictable that the United States would raise the matter at a time of fierce election-year pressures at home.
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 沪ICP证：沪ICP备05050403号-1
- |
- 互联网新闻信息服务许可证：31120180004
- |
- 网络视听许可证：0909346
- |
- 广播电视节目制作许可证：沪字第354号
- |
- 增值电信业务经营许可证：沪B2-20120012
Copyright © 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
