Home » Opinion » Foreign Views
Time to take away punch bowl
By Sylvester Eijffinger and Edin Mujagic |
March 10, 2011, Thursday
|
Print Edition
Print Edition
THERE are times for thinking and acting outside the box. And then there are times to return to normality.
The West's major central banks - the Bank of England, the European Central Bank, and the United States Federal Reserve - should take this to heart. As former Fed Chairman William McChesney Martin put it: "It's the task of the central bank to take the punch bowl away when the party is still going." Recently, however, the Fed decided not only to keep the punch bowl in place, but to refill it.
When the financial crisis erupted with full force in 2008, the world's major central banks were right to employ exceptional measures. Granted, one could argue that in some cases they overshot - for example, with the second round of so-called "quantitative easing" in the US - but, roughly speaking, the response seems to have been appropriate.
More than two years later, however, the situation has changed. Economic recovery is not stellar, but it is a recovery nonetheless. Almost all developed economies have left recession far behind, and the danger of deflation has disappeared. The Swiss central bank recently adopted this position, and the ECB is worrying about higher inflation, not deflation, in the eurozone. In emerging economies, such as Brazil, China, India, and South Korea, inflation is rising.
So the time has come for the West's central banks to become "normal" again. This applies especially to the Fed and the Bank of England, and, to a lesser degree, to the ECB.
Central banks in emerging-market countries like Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Peru, Thailand, and South Korea are providing good examples. They have embarked on the normalization path by hiking official interest rates in order to nip inflation in the bud.
Trade-off
Faced with the trade-off between economic growth in the short run and over the medium to long term, these central banks are opting for the latter. By raising interest rates to prevent inflation from spiraling out of control, they inflict some pain on the economy now. But that pain is negligible compared to the pain that would be needed to fight runaway inflation later.
In that sense, emerging-market countries' central banks have learned the lesson of the 1970s and 1980s, when inflation ruled the world and crippled economic growth - in large part because central banks did not act in a timely fashion. Central banks like the Fed and the Bank of England seem to have forgotten that history. So, what should Western central banks do?
In the first place, use of a "core inflation" indicator should be put aside. There is much to say for using core inflation in conducting monetary policy and explaining decisions to the public, but only when price increases of food and energy - which core inflation strips out - are temporary in nature.
That seems not to be the case any more. In the United Kingdom, for example, supposedly "temporary" factors have been keeping the inflation rate well above the target for almost two years. The ECB recently published a report saying that food prices will most likely increase further, because demand is structurally higher than supply. The same can probably be said of various commodities, including oil.
Second, Western central banks should start rolling back the emergency measures put in place in response to the financial and economic crisis. This applies particularly to the Fed, which in the autumn of 2010 launched a second round of quantitative easing to stimulate economic growth and employment in the short run, but also to the Bank of England, which is criticized for being too lax.
Finally, in order to stand a chance of preventing inflation from increasing much further, real interest rates must, at the very least, be equal to zero or slightly positive. That has not been the case for a long time, and still is not the case with headline inflation running at 2.2 percent in the eurozone and 1.5 percent in the US. Even when we look at core inflation, real interest rates in the US are still deep in negative territory. The picture is especially grim for the UK, with the official interest rate at 0.5 percent and inflation at 3.3 percent.
0 to 3 percent
To prevent inflation from spiraling out of control, the Fed should increase the federal funds rate from almost 0 percent now to at least 3 percent within a year or so. In the same time frame, the ECB should move its official rate from 1 percent to at least 2 percent, while the Bank of England should aim for 5 percent.
Choosing a short-term boost to economic growth and employment, rather than enforcing price stability, wrecked the world economy in the 1970s and 1980s. The outcome may not be much different this time around if Western central banks maintain their current monetary policies for much longer.
For years, these banks' officials have invited their counterparts from developing and emerging-market countries to conferences in order to teach them the tricks of the trade. Maybe now the time has come for the teachers to learn from their students.
(Sylvester Eijffinger is Professor of Financial Economics at Tilburg University in the Netherlands. Edin Mujagic is a monetary economist at ECR Research and Tilburg University. Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2011. www.project-syndicate.org)
The West's major central banks - the Bank of England, the European Central Bank, and the United States Federal Reserve - should take this to heart. As former Fed Chairman William McChesney Martin put it: "It's the task of the central bank to take the punch bowl away when the party is still going." Recently, however, the Fed decided not only to keep the punch bowl in place, but to refill it.
When the financial crisis erupted with full force in 2008, the world's major central banks were right to employ exceptional measures. Granted, one could argue that in some cases they overshot - for example, with the second round of so-called "quantitative easing" in the US - but, roughly speaking, the response seems to have been appropriate.
More than two years later, however, the situation has changed. Economic recovery is not stellar, but it is a recovery nonetheless. Almost all developed economies have left recession far behind, and the danger of deflation has disappeared. The Swiss central bank recently adopted this position, and the ECB is worrying about higher inflation, not deflation, in the eurozone. In emerging economies, such as Brazil, China, India, and South Korea, inflation is rising.
So the time has come for the West's central banks to become "normal" again. This applies especially to the Fed and the Bank of England, and, to a lesser degree, to the ECB.
Central banks in emerging-market countries like Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Peru, Thailand, and South Korea are providing good examples. They have embarked on the normalization path by hiking official interest rates in order to nip inflation in the bud.
Trade-off
Faced with the trade-off between economic growth in the short run and over the medium to long term, these central banks are opting for the latter. By raising interest rates to prevent inflation from spiraling out of control, they inflict some pain on the economy now. But that pain is negligible compared to the pain that would be needed to fight runaway inflation later.
In that sense, emerging-market countries' central banks have learned the lesson of the 1970s and 1980s, when inflation ruled the world and crippled economic growth - in large part because central banks did not act in a timely fashion. Central banks like the Fed and the Bank of England seem to have forgotten that history. So, what should Western central banks do?
In the first place, use of a "core inflation" indicator should be put aside. There is much to say for using core inflation in conducting monetary policy and explaining decisions to the public, but only when price increases of food and energy - which core inflation strips out - are temporary in nature.
That seems not to be the case any more. In the United Kingdom, for example, supposedly "temporary" factors have been keeping the inflation rate well above the target for almost two years. The ECB recently published a report saying that food prices will most likely increase further, because demand is structurally higher than supply. The same can probably be said of various commodities, including oil.
Second, Western central banks should start rolling back the emergency measures put in place in response to the financial and economic crisis. This applies particularly to the Fed, which in the autumn of 2010 launched a second round of quantitative easing to stimulate economic growth and employment in the short run, but also to the Bank of England, which is criticized for being too lax.
Finally, in order to stand a chance of preventing inflation from increasing much further, real interest rates must, at the very least, be equal to zero or slightly positive. That has not been the case for a long time, and still is not the case with headline inflation running at 2.2 percent in the eurozone and 1.5 percent in the US. Even when we look at core inflation, real interest rates in the US are still deep in negative territory. The picture is especially grim for the UK, with the official interest rate at 0.5 percent and inflation at 3.3 percent.
0 to 3 percent
To prevent inflation from spiraling out of control, the Fed should increase the federal funds rate from almost 0 percent now to at least 3 percent within a year or so. In the same time frame, the ECB should move its official rate from 1 percent to at least 2 percent, while the Bank of England should aim for 5 percent.
Choosing a short-term boost to economic growth and employment, rather than enforcing price stability, wrecked the world economy in the 1970s and 1980s. The outcome may not be much different this time around if Western central banks maintain their current monetary policies for much longer.
For years, these banks' officials have invited their counterparts from developing and emerging-market countries to conferences in order to teach them the tricks of the trade. Maybe now the time has come for the teachers to learn from their students.
(Sylvester Eijffinger is Professor of Financial Economics at Tilburg University in the Netherlands. Edin Mujagic is a monetary economist at ECR Research and Tilburg University. Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2011. www.project-syndicate.org)
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 沪ICP证：沪ICP备05050403号-1
- |
- 互联网新闻信息服务许可证：31120180004
- |
- 网络视听许可证：0909346
- |
- 广播电视节目制作许可证：沪字第354号
- |
- 增值电信业务经营许可证：沪B2-20120012
Copyright © 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
