Home » Opinion » Foreign Views
US needs better skills to lift manufacturing
By Suzanne Rosselet |
January 18, 2013, Friday
|
Print Edition
Print Edition
CAN US President Barack Obama change the course of US competitiveness?
With inauguration day around the corner, let?s look at what has happened over the past few years.
The US dropped out of its No. 1 position in the IMD World Competitiveness Yearbook, mainly due to a dramatic slide in its government efficiency, falling from 5th place in 2002 to 22nd today. Similarly, the US economy is suffering a relative decline in the World Economic Forum?s Global Competitiveness Report, falling to 7th place from 1s tin 2007.
If this wasn?t worrying enough, a study published last year by Harvard Business School indicates that no fewer than 71 percent of respondents in a survey of nearly 10,000 HBS alumni expect US competitiveness to decline over the next three years. In the World Bank?s Doing Business Report, the US ranks 4th in terms of the ease of doing business, including a dismal 68th place for the ease of paying taxes.
The Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF) highlights the fact that the US now ranks 4th in innovative-based competitiveness (out of 38 economies), but falls second to last in the rate of progress since 2000, ahead of only Italy. So what should be the key focus of the new Obama administration?
Cutting corporate taxes, upgrading infrastructure, introducing more òbusiness-friendlyó regulation, restoring America?s technological lead, improving the educational system and skills base, are all examples of Washington?s urgent to-do list.
But if leading up to inauguration day President Obama were to ask himself which of the above should be his biggest priority, I would suggest that investing in skills and education are the critical contributors to lifting competitiveness.
Why? Because the US is currently in the midst of a historical manufacturing revival. Developing a long-term skills? strategy is vital to ensure that the US can capitalize on this trend.
Outsourcing to low-cost countries is no longer as tempting with labor and transportation costs rising in many of these countries. In addition, the US will benefit from an enormous energy windfall thanks to shale gas, helping to make it one of the lowest-cost countries in terms of energy.
If you add the benefits of higher quality manufactured goods and state-of-the-art innovation capabilities, the US has a fair chance of regaining its historical leadership in advanced manufacturing.
Yet meeting the challenges of this òmanufacturing revivaló puts the focus on closing the skills gap through more, and better-targeted, investment in education.
Due to the time lag involved in preparing tomorrow?s skilled workforce, the question remains: Will the US miss the train?
Electoral promise
President Obama has pledged to revitalize US manufacturing, boost exports and create more jobs ?an electoral promise critical in tackling America?s historically high level of unemployment (7.7 percent in November 2012).
A recent study by the Boston Consulting Group claims that the US is on course to regain its status as a global industrial powerhouse, boosting goods exports and creating between 2.5 and 5 million jobs by the end of the decade.
Since American manufacturing has been in steady decline since the 1980s, this is news that could turn President Obama?s New Year?s resolutions into realistic opportunities.
This means closing the skills gap to sustain any revival in manufacturing, whether it is American companies re-shoring production back to the US or foreign companies attracted to a more cost-competitive US for livening
Recommendations
Three recommendations were proposed in July 2012 by the President?s Council of Advisers on Science and Technology to support advanced manufacturing.
This multi-stakeholder council, made up of business leaders, academics and scientists, called on President Obama to make good on his promise to create an òeconomy built to lastó by: a) enabling innovation, b) securing the talent pipeline, and c) improving the business climate.
Just to focus on the second recommendation, that of building, attracting and retaining talent, the Council recommends an advertising campaign to promote manufacturing as an exciting career path, building on the skills of returning veterans, investing in more community colleges, creating partnerships between industry and these colleges, as well as promoting manufacturing fellowships and internships.
I would add re-focusing career choices towards high value-added, knowledge-intensive manufacturing, and educational curriculum towards science, technology, engineering and mathematics. Supplement this with more technical training during or after high school, and ensuring that young people finish their education (less than 58 percent of students in the US graduate on time at four-year colleges).
Lastly, improve the quality of US high school education. Despite the fact that more than half of the world?s 100 leading universities are American (and eight of the top 10n), American high school graduates rank poorly in international test scores: in the OECD PISA rankings, American 15-year olds ranked 25th in mathematics, 17th in reading and 22nd in science (out of 34 countries).
Since most experts acknowledge that advanced manufacturing is the best bet for creating high-paying jobs, with the additional advantages of contributing to innovation and reducing the US trade deficit, President Obama would do well to heed the advice of his Council.
Investing in the skills of the American people has got to be the overall objective of any US administration and should be at the top of the list of President Obama?s New Year?s resolutions.
Dr Suzanne Rosselet is a research fellow at IMD, specializing in world competitiveness. She holds a degree in economics from Stanford University and previously served as deputy director of IMD?s World Competitiveness Yearbook. Shanghai Daily condensed the article.
With inauguration day around the corner, let?s look at what has happened over the past few years.
The US dropped out of its No. 1 position in the IMD World Competitiveness Yearbook, mainly due to a dramatic slide in its government efficiency, falling from 5th place in 2002 to 22nd today. Similarly, the US economy is suffering a relative decline in the World Economic Forum?s Global Competitiveness Report, falling to 7th place from 1s tin 2007.
If this wasn?t worrying enough, a study published last year by Harvard Business School indicates that no fewer than 71 percent of respondents in a survey of nearly 10,000 HBS alumni expect US competitiveness to decline over the next three years. In the World Bank?s Doing Business Report, the US ranks 4th in terms of the ease of doing business, including a dismal 68th place for the ease of paying taxes.
The Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF) highlights the fact that the US now ranks 4th in innovative-based competitiveness (out of 38 economies), but falls second to last in the rate of progress since 2000, ahead of only Italy. So what should be the key focus of the new Obama administration?
Cutting corporate taxes, upgrading infrastructure, introducing more òbusiness-friendlyó regulation, restoring America?s technological lead, improving the educational system and skills base, are all examples of Washington?s urgent to-do list.
But if leading up to inauguration day President Obama were to ask himself which of the above should be his biggest priority, I would suggest that investing in skills and education are the critical contributors to lifting competitiveness.
Why? Because the US is currently in the midst of a historical manufacturing revival. Developing a long-term skills? strategy is vital to ensure that the US can capitalize on this trend.
Outsourcing to low-cost countries is no longer as tempting with labor and transportation costs rising in many of these countries. In addition, the US will benefit from an enormous energy windfall thanks to shale gas, helping to make it one of the lowest-cost countries in terms of energy.
If you add the benefits of higher quality manufactured goods and state-of-the-art innovation capabilities, the US has a fair chance of regaining its historical leadership in advanced manufacturing.
Yet meeting the challenges of this òmanufacturing revivaló puts the focus on closing the skills gap through more, and better-targeted, investment in education.
Due to the time lag involved in preparing tomorrow?s skilled workforce, the question remains: Will the US miss the train?
Electoral promise
President Obama has pledged to revitalize US manufacturing, boost exports and create more jobs ?an electoral promise critical in tackling America?s historically high level of unemployment (7.7 percent in November 2012).
A recent study by the Boston Consulting Group claims that the US is on course to regain its status as a global industrial powerhouse, boosting goods exports and creating between 2.5 and 5 million jobs by the end of the decade.
Since American manufacturing has been in steady decline since the 1980s, this is news that could turn President Obama?s New Year?s resolutions into realistic opportunities.
This means closing the skills gap to sustain any revival in manufacturing, whether it is American companies re-shoring production back to the US or foreign companies attracted to a more cost-competitive US for livening
Recommendations
Three recommendations were proposed in July 2012 by the President?s Council of Advisers on Science and Technology to support advanced manufacturing.
This multi-stakeholder council, made up of business leaders, academics and scientists, called on President Obama to make good on his promise to create an òeconomy built to lastó by: a) enabling innovation, b) securing the talent pipeline, and c) improving the business climate.
Just to focus on the second recommendation, that of building, attracting and retaining talent, the Council recommends an advertising campaign to promote manufacturing as an exciting career path, building on the skills of returning veterans, investing in more community colleges, creating partnerships between industry and these colleges, as well as promoting manufacturing fellowships and internships.
I would add re-focusing career choices towards high value-added, knowledge-intensive manufacturing, and educational curriculum towards science, technology, engineering and mathematics. Supplement this with more technical training during or after high school, and ensuring that young people finish their education (less than 58 percent of students in the US graduate on time at four-year colleges).
Lastly, improve the quality of US high school education. Despite the fact that more than half of the world?s 100 leading universities are American (and eight of the top 10n), American high school graduates rank poorly in international test scores: in the OECD PISA rankings, American 15-year olds ranked 25th in mathematics, 17th in reading and 22nd in science (out of 34 countries).
Since most experts acknowledge that advanced manufacturing is the best bet for creating high-paying jobs, with the additional advantages of contributing to innovation and reducing the US trade deficit, President Obama would do well to heed the advice of his Council.
Investing in the skills of the American people has got to be the overall objective of any US administration and should be at the top of the list of President Obama?s New Year?s resolutions.
Dr Suzanne Rosselet is a research fellow at IMD, specializing in world competitiveness. She holds a degree in economics from Stanford University and previously served as deputy director of IMD?s World Competitiveness Yearbook. Shanghai Daily condensed the article.
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 沪ICP证：沪ICP备05050403号-1
- |
- 互联网新闻信息服务许可证：31120180004
- |
- 网络视听许可证：0909346
- |
- 广播电视节目制作许可证：沪字第354号
- |
- 增值电信业务经营许可证：沪B2-20120012
Copyright © 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
