Long road ahead for fully self-driving cars
Print Edition
The road to fully self-driving vehicles remains riddled with obstacles, with years of refinements likely needed, despite Tesla founder Elon Musk鈥檚 claim to be able to produce one this year.
Musk鈥檚 suggestion that Tesla is nearing 鈥淟evel 5鈥 autonomy appeared to stun the sector, which has repeatedly pushed back forecasts for vehicles able to operate without human help.
The Tesla founder and CEO said in a message to the recent World Artificial Intelligence Conference in Shanghai that he was 鈥渆xtremely confident that 鈥楲evel 5,鈥 or essentially complete autonomy, will happen ... very quickly.鈥
He maintained that he expected 鈥渢he basic functionality鈥 of Level 5 to be "complete this year.鈥
But analysts say the pledge appeared to be hyperbole from Musk, who had pledged to deliver self-driving cars by 2018, and more recently promised to deploy robo-taxis by 2020.
鈥淲e鈥檙e still a long way from a true Level 4 system, so the 鈥榲ery close to Level 5鈥 comment seems out of nowhere, especially given the reset people have had in recent years,鈥 said Paul Lewis, who heads policy research at the nonprofit Eno Center for Transportation.
Lewis said there was 鈥渢remendous excitement鈥 several years ago about the potential for full autonomy, but it has since waned.
鈥淭echnology developers are starting to realize the limits of artificial intelligence and the benefits of the human brain in handling some of these tasks.鈥
Raj Rajkumar, a Carnegie Mellon University engineering professor and co-director of the school鈥檚 auto technology research lab, said he was highly skeptical as well.
The recent claim 鈥渕ay be just another technique by Tesla to realize more of the revenue鈥 from the semi-autonomous system the company uses, the researcher said.
鈥淲e have been many times here before,鈥 Rajkumar said, citing Tesla's prior pledges on full autonomy.
鈥楩irehose of randomness鈥
Tesla is in a fierce race with tech firms and other automakers for the lead in self-driving technology.
The Californian electric carmaker became the world鈥檚 most valuable auto manufacturer earlier this month, and its shares have soared amid strong demand, even as it produces only a fraction of the vehicles of many rivals.
The former Google car division now known as Waymo operates a test program in Arizona at Level 4 autonomy. That means a vehicle does not need a driver but operates in a geographically circumscribed area.
But Lewis said the Waymo system has limits because 鈥渢here is still some level of monitoring,鈥 with a remote system that could require a human to take over.
Ed Niedermeyer, head of communications for Partners for Automated Vehicle Education, which includes nonprofit organizations and auto technology firms (but not Tesla), said Level 4 is the major focus of the group鈥檚 members.
鈥淭he reason companies are not talking about Level 5 is that you鈥檙e talking about drinking from the firehose of randomness,鈥 said Niedermeyer.
Level 5 means a vehicle can handle any situation, any type of weather or any terrain without human assistance 鈥 a tall order, in Niedermeyer's view.
Level 4, however, would 鈥渞educe the number of variables,鈥 in part by operating within a specific area, whether an enclosed test site, a college campus or even an entire city.
鈥淭here鈥檚 no single technical standard for Level 4; you can define it for yourself,鈥 said Niedermeyer.
Dangerous claims
Some analysts warn that promoting a system as autonomous could lead motorists to make dangerous assumptions and neglect the steering wheel, with potentially fatal consequences.
Tesla has been criticized over a number of accidents involving drivers using its 鈥淎utopilot鈥 program.
鈥淭here is a danger in promoting self-driving capabilities that are not accurate,鈥 Lewis said. Autopilot, he noted, is a Level 2 system that requires drivers to be attentive at all times.
Niedermeyer said it is important to educate the public about the differences between autonomy and 鈥渄river assistance systems鈥 which take over some functions but require a person at the wheel.
And even if the technical hurdles to full autonomy are overcome, public acceptance remains a challenge, said Susan Shaheen, co-director of the Transportation Sustainability Research Center at the University of California at Berkeley.
鈥淭here has not yet been extensive work to advance the understanding of public AV (autonomous vehicle) acceptance and concerns,鈥 said Shaheen, noting the possible risks of safety, cybersecurity and data breaches.
鈥淢ore research is needed to understand these and other concerns,鈥 she said.
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 娌狪CP璇侊細娌狪CP澶05050403鍙-1
- |
- 浜掕仈缃戞柊闂讳俊鎭湇鍔¤鍙瘉锛31120180004
- |
- 缃戠粶瑙嗗惉璁稿彲璇侊細0909346
- |
- 骞挎挱鐢佃鑺傜洰鍒朵綔璁稿彲璇侊細娌瓧绗354鍙
- |
- 澧炲肩數淇′笟鍔＄粡钀ヨ鍙瘉锛氭勃B2-20120012
Copyright 漏 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
