US not to probe unfair subsidy charge
THE United States Commerce Department has announced its decision not to initiate investigation on allegations that China's currency practices constitute an unfair subsidy.
The currency allegations under review were made in the context of countervailing duties investigations of two Chinese products - aluminum extrusions and coated paper.
"Two allegations before it that China's currency practices constitute an unfair subsidy under US countervailing duty law failed to meet the requirements for the initiation of an investigation," the department said in a statement on Tuesday.
"Today's (Tuesday) currency decision was based on a careful evaluation of the specific legal arguments and evidence put before the department, in relation to the standards for the initiation of an investigation under the CVD law," Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration Ronald K. Lorentzen said.
"In these two cases, the department has determined not to investigate whether the alleged undervaluation of China's currency, the yuan, is a countervailable subsidy," it said.
Lorentzen said the department made the decision because "the allegations made by domestic producers do not meet the statutory standard for initiating an investigation under the requirement that benefits provided under China's unified foreign exchange regime be specific to the enterprise or industries being investigated."
However, in a preliminary determination, the department ruled that US$514 million of aluminum products imported from China in 2009 were unfairly subsidized. As a result, importers of Chinese aluminum extrusions will be required to post cash deposits or bonds at rates determined by the department.
Aluminum extrusions are shapes and forms made via an extrusion process of aluminum alloys.
The currency allegations under review were made in the context of countervailing duties investigations of two Chinese products - aluminum extrusions and coated paper.
"Two allegations before it that China's currency practices constitute an unfair subsidy under US countervailing duty law failed to meet the requirements for the initiation of an investigation," the department said in a statement on Tuesday.
"Today's (Tuesday) currency decision was based on a careful evaluation of the specific legal arguments and evidence put before the department, in relation to the standards for the initiation of an investigation under the CVD law," Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration Ronald K. Lorentzen said.
"In these two cases, the department has determined not to investigate whether the alleged undervaluation of China's currency, the yuan, is a countervailable subsidy," it said.
Lorentzen said the department made the decision because "the allegations made by domestic producers do not meet the statutory standard for initiating an investigation under the requirement that benefits provided under China's unified foreign exchange regime be specific to the enterprise or industries being investigated."
However, in a preliminary determination, the department ruled that US$514 million of aluminum products imported from China in 2009 were unfairly subsidized. As a result, importers of Chinese aluminum extrusions will be required to post cash deposits or bonds at rates determined by the department.
Aluminum extrusions are shapes and forms made via an extrusion process of aluminum alloys.
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS
- |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 娌狪CP璇侊細娌狪CP澶05050403鍙-1
- |
- 浜掕仈缃戞柊闂讳俊鎭湇鍔¤鍙瘉锛31120180004
- |
- 缃戠粶瑙嗗惉璁稿彲璇侊細0909346
- |
- 骞挎挱鐢佃鑺傜洰鍒朵綔璁稿彲璇侊細娌瓧绗354鍙
- |
- 澧炲肩數淇′笟鍔$粡钀ヨ鍙瘉锛氭勃B2-20120012
Copyright 漏 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.