Home
News
In Focus
Business
Metro
Nation
World
Sports
Feature
Opinion
View more »Opinion Columns
Wan LixinOpinion deputy editor of Shanghai Daily
It’s not sports! Overzealous fans should respect their idols
Experts in China studies impressed by city’s transformation during site visits
Sunday
- Subscribe
Related News
Watchdog asks Treasury to get more data from banks
By Jim Kuhnhenn |
July 20, 2009, Monday
|
Print Edition
Print Edition
THE internal watchdog overseeing the United States government's financial bailout is pressing Treasury to seek more information from banks that receive taxpayer assistance, brandishing his own bank survey as evidence that such data can be obtained.
More than eight out of 10 banks responding to Special Inspector General Neil Barofsky's survey said the money they received from the government had been used for loans or to avoid reduced lending.
Fewer than a third of the 360 banks surveyed said their lending levels would have been lower without money from the US$700-billion Troubled Asset Relief Program. Banks also reported using the money to provide additional cushions of capital or to buy other institutions.
The law that created the bailout fund did not require banks to segregate the government's assistance or to track how it was used, though Congress' intent was to increase loans, either directly or by unclogging credit markets. But there is no process in place to make sure the money is specifically used to boost lending, and there are no consequences for banks that don't use it to that end.
Treasury's top official in charge of the program minimized the significance of Barofsky's survey, saying few conclusions could be drawn from the data.
"Although it might be tempting to do so, it is not possible to say that investment of TARP dollars resulted in particular loans, investments or other activities by the recipient," Assistant Treasury Secretary Herbert Allison wrote in response to the Barofsky's audit.
Treasury conducts its own, more limited lending survey of 21 large banks. In its latest survey, released last Wednesday, Treasury reported that outstanding loan balances were flat in May and that the banks reported modest growth in new loan originations.
Even Barofsky cautioned that in his survey banks did not quantify the amount of new lending or the incremental difference in lending attributable to the bailout funds. As a result, Barofsky said there was not enough data to obtain an aggregate amount of new lending caused by the taxpayer infusions.
But Barofsky said banks receiving infusions are likely to budget how they would use the money and be able to indicate generally what the bank was able to do that it would not have done without the assistance.
"Treasury's decision to reject this information just because the bank may not be able to trace the exact dollars ignores this common sense view," Barofsky wrote in his report, to be released today.
It recommended that Treasury require bailout recipients to submit periodic reports on their use of the TARP money and to detail actions they took that they would have been unable to undertake without the government aid.
More than eight out of 10 banks responding to Special Inspector General Neil Barofsky's survey said the money they received from the government had been used for loans or to avoid reduced lending.
Fewer than a third of the 360 banks surveyed said their lending levels would have been lower without money from the US$700-billion Troubled Asset Relief Program. Banks also reported using the money to provide additional cushions of capital or to buy other institutions.
The law that created the bailout fund did not require banks to segregate the government's assistance or to track how it was used, though Congress' intent was to increase loans, either directly or by unclogging credit markets. But there is no process in place to make sure the money is specifically used to boost lending, and there are no consequences for banks that don't use it to that end.
Treasury's top official in charge of the program minimized the significance of Barofsky's survey, saying few conclusions could be drawn from the data.
"Although it might be tempting to do so, it is not possible to say that investment of TARP dollars resulted in particular loans, investments or other activities by the recipient," Assistant Treasury Secretary Herbert Allison wrote in response to the Barofsky's audit.
Treasury conducts its own, more limited lending survey of 21 large banks. In its latest survey, released last Wednesday, Treasury reported that outstanding loan balances were flat in May and that the banks reported modest growth in new loan originations.
Even Barofsky cautioned that in his survey banks did not quantify the amount of new lending or the incremental difference in lending attributable to the bailout funds. As a result, Barofsky said there was not enough data to obtain an aggregate amount of new lending caused by the taxpayer infusions.
But Barofsky said banks receiving infusions are likely to budget how they would use the money and be able to indicate generally what the bank was able to do that it would not have done without the assistance.
"Treasury's decision to reject this information just because the bank may not be able to trace the exact dollars ignores this common sense view," Barofsky wrote in his report, to be released today.
It recommended that Treasury require bailout recipients to submit periodic reports on their use of the TARP money and to detail actions they took that they would have been unable to undertake without the government aid.
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 沪ICP证：沪ICP备05050403号-1
- |
- 互联网新闻信息服务许可证：31120180004
- |
- 网络视听许可证：0909346
- |
- 广播电视节目制作许可证：沪字第354号
- |
- 增值电信业务经营许可证：沪B2-20120012
Copyright © 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
