The story appears on

Page A10

June 5, 2014

GET this page in PDF

Free for subscribers

View shopping cart

Related News

Home » Business » Finance

First delisting since rules reformed in 2012

AS the closing bell rang in the Shanghai Stock Exchange yesterday, China’s equity market witnessed the first delisting since reform of the delisting rules in 2012.

The removal of Nanjing Tanker Corp under the state-owned China Changjiang National Shipping (Group) Corp from the bourse came after it posted losses for four consecutive years. It is the first delisting ever of a state firm.

Share price of Nanjing Tanker closed flat at a junk price of 0.83 yuan (13 US cents) before it will be officially delisted today.

But controversies about the company and the country’s delisting rules still linger.

Although delisting is common in the US and other equity markets, it is quite rare in China, where majority shareholders and local governments decide whether a company should be pulled from the market.

About 4,500 US companies have been delisted from the New York Stock Exchange since 1962, but only 78 Chinese companies have been ousted from Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges since 2001 when China introduced the delisting rules, according to a study by Pi Haizhou, an independent financial commentator. That is almost 90 each year in the US as opposed to six or so each year in China.

“The delisting system of China’s A-share markets is flawed,” Pi wrote in his blog, saying the Nanjing Tanker’s delisting deserves no applause.

Under current rules, delisting focuses on financial reports — those that make losses for three straight years face suspension. Stocks may be delisted if trading volume is too low or the share price falls below 1 yuan.

Xiao Gang, chairman of the China Securities Regulatory Commission, said in January that the legal basis for delisting in cases such as “major violations” needs clarification. Delisting will become regular and the CSRC needs better delisting rules.

Half of recent delistings in China were voluntary, and part of strategic restructuring or privatization, while the other half were compulsory due to financial reports.

The Nanjing Tanker’s delisting still infuriated some in the market because some other companies involved in financial fraud have avoided delisting. For example, shares of Nanjing Textile Import & Export Co are still traded although the company falsely reported gains in profits totaling 340 million yuan for five straight years.

Green Land Biological Technology Co and Wanfu Biotechnology Agricultural Development Co have stayed on the market despite having been found to have cheated in their financial statements over the last two years.

 




 

Copyright © 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.

沪公网安备 31010602000204号

Email this to your friend