Starbucks, Fiat told to reclaim back taxes
Print Edition
THE European Commission ruled yesterday that Starbucks and Fiat benefited from illegal tax deals with the Dutch and Luxembourg governments, in cases with major effects for the taxation of multinational firms.
Anti-trust commissioner Margrethe Vestager said all firms must pay a “fair share” and ordered the Netherlands to recover 20-30 million euros (US$23-34 million) in back taxes from the US coffee shop chain. Luxembourg must recover a similar amount from Italian-US carmaker Fiat Chrysler Automobiles, she said.
Starbucks immediately said it would appeal, echoing the Dutch government in accusing the European Union executive of significant “errors” in its assessment. Luxembourg, where much of the economy has been built on attracting multinational firms, said it disagreed and reserved its right to appeal.
Fiat denied receiving any aid from Luxembourg.
Vestager, a Dane who has denied accusations of anti-American bias in launching other tax probes into Apple and Amazon and competition inquiries into Google, took care to avoid intruding on EU governments’ jealously guarded rights to set their own tax rates. The issue, she stressed, was firms being treated differently within the same national system.
“The decisions send a clear message,” she said in Brussels. “National tax authorities cannot give any company, however large or powerful, an unfair competitive advantage compared to others. For most companies, especially the small and medium-sized, I hope this is a reassuring message.”
The commission said Starbucks benefited from a tax ruling — an assurance of future tax levels — from Dutch authorities in 2008 and Fiat from a ruling in Luxembourg in 2012. It concluded that the taxable profits for Fiat’s Luxembourg unit could have been 20 times higher under normal market conditions.
The precise amount of tax to be recovered must now be determined by Luxembourg and the Netherlands on the basis of the commission’s methodology.
Marc Sanders of tax advisers Taxand said the ruling would “rock the corporate world to its very core.”
“Whilst multinationals were lured to EU states with offers of low tax rates as an incentive, little did they know that, despite having agreement at the highest national level, this would come back and bite a decade later,” he said.
Warning that “we do not stop here,” Vestager described the cases of Apple in Ireland and Amazon in Luxembourg, where the commission also suspects the companies of benefiting from illegal state subsidies via the tax system, as “very different.” She declined to say when she would rule on them.
Inquiries are also continuing into the Belgian government’s treatment of dozens of unidentified companies.
“More cases may come if we have indications that EU state aid rules are not being complied with,” she warned, while noting there was a broader EU and global bid, coordinated by the OECD, to crack down on tax avoidance using artificial cash flows via ultra-low tax regimes.
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 沪ICP证：沪ICP备05050403号-1
- |
- 互联网新闻信息服务许可证：31120180004
- |
- 网络视听许可证：0909346
- |
- 广播电视节目制作许可证：沪字第354号
- |
- 增值电信业务经营许可证：沪B2-20120012
Copyright © 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
