US Supreme Court rejects Apple appeal
Print Edition
THE US Supreme Court yesterday upheld a ruling that Apple was part of a price-fixing conspiracy for electronic books, clearing the way for a US$450 million settlement to be paid.
The top court declined without comment to hear an appeal from Apple, which lets stand a 2013 ruling by a New York federal judge.
Apple had tentatively agreed to pay out US$450 million to compensate consumers harmed by the price-fixing, while at the same time pursuing its appeal.
In July 2013, US District Judge Denise Cote ruled Apple was liable for conspiring with five book publishers to fix e-book prices.
The case stems from a complaint filed on behalf of consumers, accusing Apple of working with five top publishers in 2009-2010 to set the prices of e-books in an Apple-led effort to break Amazon’s dominance of the market.
Prior to Apple’s entry into e-books, the publishers — all of whom reached separate settlements in the case — complained about Amazon’s US$9.99 price for most titles.
Apple and the publishers agreed on contracts that let publishers set the price of most bestsellers at US$12.99 or US$14.99, but Apple won a provision that allowed it to match the prices of Amazon or any other retailer.
Apple’s CEO Tim Cook had said ahead of the trial that the firm would not settle, claiming it had done nothing wrong but was merely pursuing normal business practices.
The trial focused on a six-week period in late 2009 and early 2010 during which Apple negotiated contracts with publishers ahead of its iPad launch and proposed a new and more profitable business model.
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 娌狪CP璇侊細娌狪CP澶05050403鍙-1
- |
- 浜掕仈缃戞柊闂讳俊鎭湇鍔¤鍙瘉锛31120180004
- |
- 缃戠粶瑙嗗惉璁稿彲璇侊細0909346
- |
- 骞挎挱鐢佃鑺傜洰鍒朵綔璁稿彲璇侊細娌瓧绗354鍙
- |
- 澧炲肩數淇′笟鍔＄粡钀ヨ鍙瘉锛氭勃B2-20120012
Copyright 漏 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
