A long battle to put 鈥榣everage ratio鈥 genie in bottle
A SPECTER is haunting China鈥檚 financial sector, the specter of leverage ratio.
At a time when the leverage ratios of major economies like the United States, European Union and Japan tend to decrease, China鈥檚 macro-leverage ratio has steadily risen.
Leverage ratio is the percentage of debt in the balance sheet of a single economic entity, such as a household or a firm.
According to official statistics, as of 2017, China鈥檚 macro-leverage ratio reached 248.9 percent, approaching the US鈥檚 251.2 percent and the Eurozone鈥檚 258.3 percent.
Heightened concerns about the continued increase of leverage ratio over the past few years have been the driving force behind China鈥檚 efforts to deleverage its economy.
At a recent forum held by Fudan University鈥檚 School of Management, the issue of leverage ratio again drew the attention of many famed scholars.
One of them is Li Yang, chairman of National Institution for Finance & Development, a government-affiliated think tank. In his speech he equated high leverage ratio with high financial risk. 鈥淢any of the economic issues today, such as debt problems and worsening balance sheets of companies, can all be ascribed to the leverage ratio,鈥 said Li.
He noted that China鈥檚 financial authorities are confronted with a daunting 鈥渓ong-running鈥 task of mitigating risks arising from an over-leveraged economy. The reason he believes that deleveraging the economy will take longer than expected is twofold. China is now caught in an economic downturn as an inevitable part of the boom-and-bust economic cycle that began since the 2008 global financial crisis.
Li explained that China needs to brace for a sustained period of moderated growth marked by struggles to service debts incurred by firms, households and even governments.
Complicating the debt woes is the possibly prolonged China-US trade war, in spite of their recent 90-day ceasefire that postpones the imposition of new tariffs on Chinese import due to go into effect in January.
鈥淚f we compare notes, deleveraging is globally a long-term endeavor,鈥 said Li, adding that the US serves as a reference. It took the country almost eight years to bring down the country鈥檚 leverage ratios from the peak levels since the financial meltdown.
A breakdown of China鈥檚 debts indicates that a big part comes from soaring household debts on the back of a real estate boom. Still, they are considered to be within safety limits, said Li.
A few years ago ballooning local public debts sparked widespread concerns of a government default, but that scenario has been staved off as the central government rolled out policy measures aimed at curbing excessive borrowing by local governments through numerous financing platforms.
The real difficulty lies, again, in dealing with the state-owned enterprises.
Li explained that many loss-making, insolvent SOEs continue to be chiefly responsible for a spike in public debts, and policy-makers are now widely anticipated to lay to rest the intractable issue of so-called 鈥渮ombie enterprises鈥 over the next three years.
China鈥檚 debt levels perked up immediately following the 2008 massive stimulus package, and the lingering fallout can still be acutely felt, Li said.
Over the medium to long term, the scholar observed that management of financial risks should proceed in tandem with a series of reforms to overhaul China鈥檚 financial sector.
He outlined a few key areas in need of deepening reform measures, such as interest and exchange rate liberalization.
A long-term advocate for financial technology, or fintech, Li reflected on the trajectory of fintech鈥檚 development in China, tracing its origins to 2013 when a handful of IT companies became involved in Internet banking or peer-to-peer lending.
Subsequently, application of big data and cloud technology has given China a headstart in the current global fintech revolution. Li believes that the next phase of financial overhaul should highlight the need for financial inclusion, to help deliver financial services to millions of still unbanked population within the country.
鈥淔inancial inclusion is essentially about providing proper and efficient financial services to the social groups most in need,鈥 he said. 鈥淎nd it should be done in a way that respects their dignity.鈥
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS
- |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 娌狪CP璇侊細娌狪CP澶05050403鍙-1
- |
- 浜掕仈缃戞柊闂讳俊鎭湇鍔¤鍙瘉锛31120180004
- |
- 缃戠粶瑙嗗惉璁稿彲璇侊細0909346
- |
- 骞挎挱鐢佃鑺傜洰鍒朵綔璁稿彲璇侊細娌瓧绗354鍙
- |
- 澧炲肩數淇′笟鍔$粡钀ヨ鍙瘉锛氭勃B2-20120012
Copyright 漏 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.