The story appears on

Page A6

September 12, 2013

GET this page in PDF

Free for subscribers

View shopping cart

Related News

Home » Opinion » Chinese Views

Doubts raised about former officials as directors

THE employment of retired government officials as independent directors has become a trend among China’s listed companies, but a target of criticism among the public.

The issue did not come under the spotlight until Sinotruk Hong Kong Ltd announced the appointment of three former senior officials as its independent directors this July. They were promised annual pay of 180,000 yuan (US$29,000).

The three officials, including the governor of Shandong Province and the deputy head of the State Taxation Administration, resigned amid public and media queries on August 14. The public was worried about possible corruption and unfair market competition due to the influence of the former officials.

Xinhua reporters found that at this time, seven of 48 independent directors at the top 10 A-share companies by market value are retired senior officials. Former officials who are now independent directors, or outside directors, are also common among central government-administered state-owned enterprises. For example, Liu Hongru, former deputy governor of China’s central bank, holds an independent director post at PetroChina.

Statistics from the financial information server 10jqka.com.cn show that there are about 5,760 independent directors employed in companies listed on China’s Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges, among whom 2,590, or 44.9 percent, have political backgrounds.

They had mainly worked in government departments related to auditing, taxation, finance, law and human resources, according to the report. More than 30 of them were retired officials at the ministerial level, and more than 100 used to be mayors. More than 720 had assumed posts equivalent to head of a county.

ÔDependent’ directors

The independent director system was introduced by the China Securities Regulatory Commission in 2001 to restrict the power of major company shareholders.

“The system is aimed at constraining the power of management and better protecting the interests of minority shareholders. But its role has not been fulfilled well as China’s listed companies are usually controlled by a single majority shareholder,” said Liu Jipeng, director of the capital research center at the China University of Political Science and Law.

By convention, to become an independent director, one should first be examined for qualifications for the post and then be nominated by the company and voted in at the stockholders’ meeting, said Liu Guohua, head of the Guangzhou-based Benben Law Firm.

However, most independent directors in China are in fact recommended by the largest shareholder, which cannot ensure the independence of independent directors.

Xinhua found almost all public companies did not elaborate on who nominated the candidates and why they were nominated.

After the resignation of the three former officials, Sinotruk said it “respects and accepts their decision,” but declined to reveal why it employed the three.

Despite years of political experience, these former officials, some in their 70s, may not have sufficient energy and economic expertise to perform their duties as independent directors.

Referring to the annual reports of a number of listed state-owned companies, reporters found some aging independent directors failed to attend all board meetings.

Zhu Lijia, a professor with the Chinese Academy of Governance, said retired officials must not assume such posts in the same industries and places they worked before in order to avoid nepotism.

 




 

Copyright © 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.

沪公网安备 31010602000204号

Email this to your friend