Related News
Home 禄 Opinion 禄 Chinese Views
Rape by any other name is rape
By Wu Jiayin |
May 20, 2009, Wednesday
|
Print Edition
Print Edition
IT is shameful that a local official in Yibin County of Sichuan Province should have defiled a girl under 14.
It is even more outrageous that police applied a suspended regulation to help the official escape severe punishment, letting him off the hook lightly.
Lu Yumin, a 47-year-old taxation official, is widely reported to have had sex with a 13-year-old middle school student last December.
He was only accused of patronizing a prostitute, however, and was sentenced to 15 days' administrative detention and a 5,000 yuan (US$732) fine, the Chengdu Commercial Daily reported on May 11.
Yet under the current Criminal Law, "A person who has sex with a girl under the age of fourteen years shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than five years and concurrently to a fine."
Yet Lu escaped his due punishment because he claimed to be ignorant of the girl's age.
Local police, to justify their actions, cited a document issued in January 2003 by the Supreme People's Court, stipulating that one who has consensual sexual relations with a girl under 14 has not committed a crime, providing he is ignorant of the girl's age and the act did not have severe consequences.
The fact is that in August 2003 the high court ordered postponement of the implementation of that document. The postponement is still effective, but local authorities still applied it in Lu's case. He reportedly offered 6,000 yuan to the owner of a local hotpot restaurant surnamed Mou to find a virgin for him to have sex with and that's what he paid for the schoolgirl brought by Mou.
Lu claimed that he did not know she was underage, but he could have guessed from the girl's immature appearance.
There's a big difference between the preferential treatment official Lu received and the harsh treatment received by a young peeping Tom in Chengdu, Sichuan Province this April.The voyeur surnamed Li was accused of rape and sentenced to one year's probation because he peered at a woman in her courtyard.
He reportedly admitted he had intended to rape her but changed his mind when she spotted him.
The big difference between Lu and Li is their status, the former being an official, the latter being an ordinary person.
Indeed, it's like "one man may steal a horse while another may not look over a hedge."
Our law may be fair, but the same cannot be said for differential enforcement.
It is even more outrageous that police applied a suspended regulation to help the official escape severe punishment, letting him off the hook lightly.
Lu Yumin, a 47-year-old taxation official, is widely reported to have had sex with a 13-year-old middle school student last December.
He was only accused of patronizing a prostitute, however, and was sentenced to 15 days' administrative detention and a 5,000 yuan (US$732) fine, the Chengdu Commercial Daily reported on May 11.
Yet under the current Criminal Law, "A person who has sex with a girl under the age of fourteen years shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than five years and concurrently to a fine."
Yet Lu escaped his due punishment because he claimed to be ignorant of the girl's age.
Local police, to justify their actions, cited a document issued in January 2003 by the Supreme People's Court, stipulating that one who has consensual sexual relations with a girl under 14 has not committed a crime, providing he is ignorant of the girl's age and the act did not have severe consequences.
The fact is that in August 2003 the high court ordered postponement of the implementation of that document. The postponement is still effective, but local authorities still applied it in Lu's case. He reportedly offered 6,000 yuan to the owner of a local hotpot restaurant surnamed Mou to find a virgin for him to have sex with and that's what he paid for the schoolgirl brought by Mou.
Lu claimed that he did not know she was underage, but he could have guessed from the girl's immature appearance.
There's a big difference between the preferential treatment official Lu received and the harsh treatment received by a young peeping Tom in Chengdu, Sichuan Province this April.The voyeur surnamed Li was accused of rape and sentenced to one year's probation because he peered at a woman in her courtyard.
He reportedly admitted he had intended to rape her but changed his mind when she spotted him.
The big difference between Lu and Li is their status, the former being an official, the latter being an ordinary person.
Indeed, it's like "one man may steal a horse while another may not look over a hedge."
Our law may be fair, but the same cannot be said for differential enforcement.
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 娌狪CP璇侊細娌狪CP澶05050403鍙-1
- |
- 浜掕仈缃戞柊闂讳俊鎭湇鍔¤鍙瘉锛31120180004
- |
- 缃戠粶瑙嗗惉璁稿彲璇侊細0909346
- |
- 骞挎挱鐢佃鑺傜洰鍒朵綔璁稿彲璇侊細娌瓧绗354鍙
- |
- 澧炲肩數淇′笟鍔＄粡钀ヨ鍙瘉锛氭勃B2-20120012
Copyright 漏 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
