Home 禄 Opinion 禄 Chinese Views
US criticism of China鈥檚 anti-terror law ill-advised
Print Edition
An anti-terrorism law by China represents a development in the right direction for a country that has been a victim of violent terror attacks, especially at a time when the international community is facing an unprecedented wave of terror threats.
The legislation, adopted by China鈥檚 top legislature on Sunday afternoon and aimed at creating a legal framework for China in its dealing with terrorism both at home and abroad, is by no means an excuse for a foreign country to make unwarranted distasteful criticisms against China. Prior to the adoption of the law, the United States expressed 鈥渟erious concerns鈥 about the law, saying it would 鈥渄o more harm than good鈥 to the threat of terrorism.
It is a known fact that throwing dirt at China at every opportunity is a favored game for some people in the US.
The proclaimed US concern revolves around two points, with the first being the Chinese government鈥檚 requirement for technology firms to provide encryption keys and other sensitive data in case of terror probes, and the second being tighter regulation on media when reporting terrorism-related news events.
Washington argues that the technical requirements would lead to breach of privacy and infringement upon intellectual property rights for US firms. The argument, however, is a typical example of ignoring the elephant in the room. Only in this case, there are two elephants. Nowadays, the Internet is increasingly used by terror groups to spread their extremist ideas, recruit fighters, channel funds and plot attacks. One of the shooters in a recent carnage in south California is found to be radicalized via the Internet.
Many countries including the United States have written into law technology firms鈥 duty to cooperate in terror-related surveillance or probe. Meanwhile, although it is a common practice to oblige firms to help fight terrorism, the United States appears to have gone way further by abusing the so-called 鈥渂ackdoor access鈥 to make itself the world master of eavesdropping: It does not only spy on common US citizens but also prominent foreign leaders.
As for the US concern over possible restrictions on personal freedom, anyone with a sober mind sees the necessity to sacrifice a small portion of personal rights if it鈥檚 what it takes to preserve the ultimate personal rights to life. And the US worries about a media clampdown under the new law is a far-fetched notion, since China has hosted scores of foreign media organizations and their reporters have had access to even the highest government offices for years.
The various restrictions on media imposed by the new law only intends to prevent copy-cat crimes, protect frontline anti-terror workers and keep society from the harm of hearsay.
To admit it or not, it is the United States itself that has created grounds breeding terrorism 鈥 when its military involvement in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Syria has actually turned these countries into breeding grounds for terrorism.
In short, the US criticism against China鈥檚 anti-terrorism legislation is but yet another case of Washington鈥檚 application of double standards in dealing with issues of terrorism.
Instead of making seemingly righteous comments on China鈥檚 anti-terrorism legislation, Washington should spend more time reflecting on its counter-terrorism strategies and policies so as to make positive contributions to the global campaign against terrorism.
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 娌狪CP璇侊細娌狪CP澶05050403鍙-1
- |
- 浜掕仈缃戞柊闂讳俊鎭湇鍔¤鍙瘉锛31120180004
- |
- 缃戠粶瑙嗗惉璁稿彲璇侊細0909346
- |
- 骞挎挱鐢佃鑺傜洰鍒朵綔璁稿彲璇侊細娌瓧绗354鍙
- |
- 澧炲肩數淇′笟鍔＄粡钀ヨ鍙瘉锛氭勃B2-20120012
Copyright 漏 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
