Home » Opinion » Foreign Views
America fiddles at Copenhagen summit while the world burns
By Jeffrey D. Sachs |
December 22, 2009, Tuesday
|
Print Edition
Print Edition
TWO years of climate change negotiations have now ended in a farce in Copenhagen. Rather than grappling with complex issues, President Barack Obama decided instead to declare victory with a vague statement of principles agreed with a handful of other countries.
Responsibility for this disaster reaches far and wide. Let us start with George W. Bush, who ignored climate change for the eight years of his presidency, wasting the world's precious time.
Then comes the United Nations, for managing the negotiating process so miserably during a two-year period.
Then comes the European Union for pushing relentlessly for a single-minded vision of a global emissions-trading system, even when such a system would not fit the rest of the world.
Then comes the United States Senate, which has ignored climate change for 15 consecutive years since ratifying the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. Finally, there is Obama, who effectively abandoned a systematic course of action under the UN framework, because it was proving nettlesome to US power and domestic politics.
Obama's decision to declare a phony negotiating victory amounts to a declaration that rich countries will do what they want and must no longer listen to the "pesky" concerns of many smaller and poorer countries.
Some will view this as pragmatic, reflecting the difficulty of getting agreement with 192 UN member states. But it is worse than that.
International law, as complicated as it is, has been replaced by the insincere, inconsistent, and unconvincing word of a few powers, notably the US, which has never shown goodwill to the rest of the world on this issue, nor the ability or interest needed to take the lead on it.
Obama does not have the votes in the Senate, has not displayed any willingness to expend political capital to reach a Senate agreement, and may not even see a Senate vote on the issue in 2010 unless he pushes much harder than he has so far.
The Copenhagen summit also fell short on financial help from rich countries to poor countries. Plenty of numbers were thrown around, but most of these were, as usual, empty promises.
Aside from announcements of modest outlays for the next few years, which might - just might - add up to a real few billion dollars, the big news was a commitment of US$100 billion per year for the developing countries by 2020.
Yet this figure was unaccompanied by any details about how it would be achieved. Experience with financial aid for development teaches us that announcements about money a decade from now are mostly empty words.
They do not bind the rich countries at all. There is no political will behind them. Indeed, Obama has never once discussed with the American people their responsibility under the UN Framework Convention to help poor countries adapt to the impact of climate change.
As soon as US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton mentioned the US$100 billion "goal," many Congressmen and the conservative media denounced it.
One of the most notable features of the US-led document is that it doesn't mention any intention to continue negotiations in 2010. This is almost surely deliberate.
Obama has cut the legs out from under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, in effect declaring that the US will do what it will do, but that it will not become further entangled in messy UN climate processes in 2010.
That stance might well reflect the upcoming 2010 mid-term Congressional elections in the US.
Obama does not want to be trapped in the middle of unpopular international negotiations when election season arrives.
For me, the image that remains of Copenhagen is that of Obama appearing at a press conference to announce an agreement that only five countries had yet seen, and then rushing off to the airport to fly back to Washington, DC, to avoid a snowstorm back home.
(The author is professor of economics and director of the Earth Institute at Columbia University. The views expressed are his own. Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2009. www.project-syndicate.org)
Responsibility for this disaster reaches far and wide. Let us start with George W. Bush, who ignored climate change for the eight years of his presidency, wasting the world's precious time.
Then comes the United Nations, for managing the negotiating process so miserably during a two-year period.
Then comes the European Union for pushing relentlessly for a single-minded vision of a global emissions-trading system, even when such a system would not fit the rest of the world.
Then comes the United States Senate, which has ignored climate change for 15 consecutive years since ratifying the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. Finally, there is Obama, who effectively abandoned a systematic course of action under the UN framework, because it was proving nettlesome to US power and domestic politics.
Obama's decision to declare a phony negotiating victory amounts to a declaration that rich countries will do what they want and must no longer listen to the "pesky" concerns of many smaller and poorer countries.
Some will view this as pragmatic, reflecting the difficulty of getting agreement with 192 UN member states. But it is worse than that.
International law, as complicated as it is, has been replaced by the insincere, inconsistent, and unconvincing word of a few powers, notably the US, which has never shown goodwill to the rest of the world on this issue, nor the ability or interest needed to take the lead on it.
Obama does not have the votes in the Senate, has not displayed any willingness to expend political capital to reach a Senate agreement, and may not even see a Senate vote on the issue in 2010 unless he pushes much harder than he has so far.
The Copenhagen summit also fell short on financial help from rich countries to poor countries. Plenty of numbers were thrown around, but most of these were, as usual, empty promises.
Aside from announcements of modest outlays for the next few years, which might - just might - add up to a real few billion dollars, the big news was a commitment of US$100 billion per year for the developing countries by 2020.
Yet this figure was unaccompanied by any details about how it would be achieved. Experience with financial aid for development teaches us that announcements about money a decade from now are mostly empty words.
They do not bind the rich countries at all. There is no political will behind them. Indeed, Obama has never once discussed with the American people their responsibility under the UN Framework Convention to help poor countries adapt to the impact of climate change.
As soon as US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton mentioned the US$100 billion "goal," many Congressmen and the conservative media denounced it.
One of the most notable features of the US-led document is that it doesn't mention any intention to continue negotiations in 2010. This is almost surely deliberate.
Obama has cut the legs out from under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, in effect declaring that the US will do what it will do, but that it will not become further entangled in messy UN climate processes in 2010.
That stance might well reflect the upcoming 2010 mid-term Congressional elections in the US.
Obama does not want to be trapped in the middle of unpopular international negotiations when election season arrives.
For me, the image that remains of Copenhagen is that of Obama appearing at a press conference to announce an agreement that only five countries had yet seen, and then rushing off to the airport to fly back to Washington, DC, to avoid a snowstorm back home.
(The author is professor of economics and director of the Earth Institute at Columbia University. The views expressed are his own. Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2009. www.project-syndicate.org)
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 沪ICP证：沪ICP备05050403号-1
- |
- 互联网新闻信息服务许可证：31120180004
- |
- 网络视听许可证：0909346
- |
- 广播电视节目制作许可证：沪字第354号
- |
- 增值电信业务经营许可证：沪B2-20120012
Copyright © 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
