Home 禄 Opinion 禄 Foreign Views
As bonds of European unity weaken, nations cannot afford to fixate on past 鈥榞lories鈥
Print Edition
Populism is on the rise throughout Europe, as both economically depressed and prosperous countries become increasingly frustrated with their established political elites. But populists are unlikely to take control of any European government in the foreseeable future, even where the risk currently seems highest.
The majority of voters, driven by fear or common sense, remain unwilling to accept the prospect of becoming isolated from the rest of Europe.
But that does not mean that the European Union is safe from divisive forces. On the contrary, the return of nationalism, even (and especially) in the countries that constituted the EU鈥檚 founding core more than 60 years ago, represents a less spectacular but potentially more corrosive threat to European unity.
This trend was starkly apparent last week during a visit to the Netherlands, one of the six original signatories of the Treaty of Rome. On my trip, I visited the Rijksmuseum, which was reopened in 2013, after a decade-long renovation. The previous building, aging and slightly outdated, was a tribute to the universal appeal of the country鈥檚 great painters like Rembrandt and Vermeer; it was a perfect celebration of light and family.
The new Rijksmuseum, despite being a striking and successful reincarnation, conveyed a very different message, serving more as a celebration of Dutch art and history. One room is devoted to the naval power of the Low Countries in the second half of the seventeenth century, when under the command of Admiral Michiel de Ruyter, the newly independent Netherlands was able to defeat at sea the French, the Spanish and even the British.
Collective psyche
Another room, called 鈥淲aterloo,鈥 highlights the defeat of Napoleon on what was then Dutch soil. It is centered on a huge painting, restored using donations from Dutch citizens, that pays tribute to the Duke of Wellington, as well as to the role of William of Orange, the future king of the Netherlands, in the battle.
Of course, I do not take issue with the Waterloo room out of some sense of French chauvinism.
But in the old Rijksmuseum, no room was required to celebrate that defeat. The Dutch people鈥檚 collective psyche did not need a reminder of their country鈥檚 contribution to Napoleon鈥檚 downfall, which led to the restoration of their independence and, for a brief period, their control over present-day Belgium.
Yet in recent years the Dutch have increasingly felt the need to celebrate their past glory in the most traditional manner. They, like other Europeans, are calling upon the past to compensate for the disillusion and frustration of the present and the uncertainty of the future.
Sixty years ago, a return to the past was precisely what European countries sought to avoid. They did not glorify historical battles, because they could see the ruins of those battles all around them: images that inspired them to build a different kind of future. By transcending national sovereignty, they hoped to protect themselves from a return to conflict and destruction.
Value of Europe
To be sure, pride in one鈥檚 national identity is not, in itself, a bad thing. On the contrary, in a Europe composed of diverse nations, confidence in one鈥檚 own identity is a prerequisite for completing economic and political integration.
But what if that national pride takes hold at a time of deep, even existential, doubt about the value of Europe? While most Europeans understand that their countries cannot address the challenges facing them alone, they are losing faith that Europe is the answer. After all, beyond its enduring economic challenges, the EU has so far proved incapable of finding a common solution to the escalating refugee crisis that is coherent, firm, and in line with European values.
The EU is not inherently incapable of addressing these challenges. The problem is that what the EU needs 鈥 more integration 鈥 is precisely what Europeans have become unwilling to support.
The 70 years since the end of World War II represent only a small fraction of Europe鈥檚 history 鈥 far from long enough to transform the way people view themselves or their countries. The danger is that 70 years was just long enough for Europeans to begin to forget why they pursued integration in the first place. If that is the case, the kind of glorification of the past on display in the renovated Rijksmuseum is a very bad sign indeed.
Dominique Moisi, a professor at L鈥橧nstitut d鈥櫭﹖udes politiques de Paris (Sciences Po), is Senior Adviser at the French Institute for International Affairs (IFRI) and a visiting professor at King鈥檚 College London.
Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2015.
www.project-syndicate.org
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 娌狪CP璇侊細娌狪CP澶05050403鍙-1
- |
- 浜掕仈缃戞柊闂讳俊鎭湇鍔¤鍙瘉锛31120180004
- |
- 缃戠粶瑙嗗惉璁稿彲璇侊細0909346
- |
- 骞挎挱鐢佃鑺傜洰鍒朵綔璁稿彲璇侊細娌瓧绗354鍙
- |
- 澧炲肩數淇′笟鍔＄粡钀ヨ鍙瘉锛氭勃B2-20120012
Copyright 漏 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
