Home » Opinion » Foreign Views
'Currency war' high on G20 agenda
By Pierre Buhler |
November 4, 2010, Thursday
|
Print Edition
Print Edition
THE unfolding "currency war," which is likely to dominate discussions at the upcoming G20 summit in Seoul, must be assessed against the backdrop of the new landscape of power - a landscape that has been transformed, in just two years, by the first crisis of the globalized economy.
The economic consequences of the crisis have left a number of developed countries in a severe slump and scrambling to bring about a healthy recovery. By contrast, the emerging-market countries, after a short slide, have managed to reignite their growth engines.
There have been financial and monetary consequences as well. Although no currency is as of yet qualified to replace the dollar as the world's reserve and transaction currency, this "exorbitant privilege," as Charles de Gaulle put it, has come under stealthy attack.
In March 2010, the "ASEAN + 3" grouping, which includes China, Japan, and South Korea, established a reserve fund of US$120 billion, under the so-called "Chiang Mai Initiative." This time, unlike in 1997, the United States did not even attempt to torpedo this embryonic "Asian Monetary Fund."
After coping well initially, Europe entered choppy waters when confronted with the prospect of Greece defaulting on its public debt. The "crisis within the crisis" exposed the eurozone's weak governance and revived doubts about the viability of a monetary union with large competitiveness gaps between its members.
The crisis has also intensified political problems. Japan, arguably the hardest hit by the global recession, faces an increasingly severe moral, demographic, and governance crisis, highlighted by its recent loss, to China, of its status as the world's second largest economy.
In Europe, bickering between leaders revealed the lack of solidarity underpinning European ideals and gave full view to the persistence of national egoisms against which the European project had managed to define itself.
Finally, the crisis has shattered the ideological dominance of the West. In previous decades, financial crises often originated in emerging economies, sanctimoniously patronized by the "virtuous" West and its institutions. This time, powered by the dogma of market resilience and self-correction, the storm formed at the heart of the world economy, the US.
The natural instinct of many is still, as in the past, to look at the American economy, towering over the rest of the world with its US$14 trillion GDP, as the engine of global recovery. Indeed, the US retains an edge, owing to its capacity for innovation, its technological advances, its entrepreneurial spirit, and its indefatigable optimism.
Weary titan
But doubts are growing. The economic powerhouse that for decades confidently provided hegemonic stability to the global economy seems at pains to continue doing so. An increasingly uncompetitive civilian industry, the burden of military commitments overseas, wage stagnation: All signal that the American titan may be wearying.
The most worrisome sign, though, is America's rising public debt - now at 95 percent of GDP and, even according to the official General Accounting Office's conservative estimate, set to soar to US$18.4 trillion by 2018. When the implied liabilities of the Social Security and Medicare systems are added on, an unprecedented level of peacetime debt confronts the US.
The paradox here is that, as its hegemonic power fades, America must rely increasingly on foreign creditors, above all China, to stay afloat. Unfortunately, the proverbial Washington political gridlock leaves little hope for fixing the problem, adding to the impression of a giant with clay feet.
The alternative to a world in which America guarantees global prosperity and stability within a liberal order is one of increasing conflict, replete with mercantilism, protectionism, and currency wars. Only a multilateral settlement among all major actors can ensure a smoothly working global order - a cause advanced in late 2008, when the technical G20 forum was quickly upgraded to a full summit in charge of global governance. Encompassing all big emerging economies, this appeared to be the most effective way to muster the legitimacy denied to the G7.
But can the G20 deliver on its promise? As the chaos at the climate-change conference in Copenhagen last December demonstrated, both the number of members around the table and the differences between them, do not bode well for the future. The present "currency war" is but another sign of that disorder.
Of course, due to its sheer military might and numerous alliances, the US will remain on top for the foreseeable future. Indeed, while hubris and the crisis have seriously undermined the world's "hyperpower," no multipolar order has emerged to follow America's "unipolar moment."
But military dominance alone is unable to confer authority, as the Afghan quagmire reminds us every day. Having succeeded in integrating the West through prosperity and security following World War II, America must begin to craft a new global leadership structure.
(The author, a former French diplomat, was an associate professor at Sciences Po, Paris. Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2010. www.project-syndicate.org. Shanghai Daily condensed the article.)
The economic consequences of the crisis have left a number of developed countries in a severe slump and scrambling to bring about a healthy recovery. By contrast, the emerging-market countries, after a short slide, have managed to reignite their growth engines.
There have been financial and monetary consequences as well. Although no currency is as of yet qualified to replace the dollar as the world's reserve and transaction currency, this "exorbitant privilege," as Charles de Gaulle put it, has come under stealthy attack.
In March 2010, the "ASEAN + 3" grouping, which includes China, Japan, and South Korea, established a reserve fund of US$120 billion, under the so-called "Chiang Mai Initiative." This time, unlike in 1997, the United States did not even attempt to torpedo this embryonic "Asian Monetary Fund."
After coping well initially, Europe entered choppy waters when confronted with the prospect of Greece defaulting on its public debt. The "crisis within the crisis" exposed the eurozone's weak governance and revived doubts about the viability of a monetary union with large competitiveness gaps between its members.
The crisis has also intensified political problems. Japan, arguably the hardest hit by the global recession, faces an increasingly severe moral, demographic, and governance crisis, highlighted by its recent loss, to China, of its status as the world's second largest economy.
In Europe, bickering between leaders revealed the lack of solidarity underpinning European ideals and gave full view to the persistence of national egoisms against which the European project had managed to define itself.
Finally, the crisis has shattered the ideological dominance of the West. In previous decades, financial crises often originated in emerging economies, sanctimoniously patronized by the "virtuous" West and its institutions. This time, powered by the dogma of market resilience and self-correction, the storm formed at the heart of the world economy, the US.
The natural instinct of many is still, as in the past, to look at the American economy, towering over the rest of the world with its US$14 trillion GDP, as the engine of global recovery. Indeed, the US retains an edge, owing to its capacity for innovation, its technological advances, its entrepreneurial spirit, and its indefatigable optimism.
Weary titan
But doubts are growing. The economic powerhouse that for decades confidently provided hegemonic stability to the global economy seems at pains to continue doing so. An increasingly uncompetitive civilian industry, the burden of military commitments overseas, wage stagnation: All signal that the American titan may be wearying.
The most worrisome sign, though, is America's rising public debt - now at 95 percent of GDP and, even according to the official General Accounting Office's conservative estimate, set to soar to US$18.4 trillion by 2018. When the implied liabilities of the Social Security and Medicare systems are added on, an unprecedented level of peacetime debt confronts the US.
The paradox here is that, as its hegemonic power fades, America must rely increasingly on foreign creditors, above all China, to stay afloat. Unfortunately, the proverbial Washington political gridlock leaves little hope for fixing the problem, adding to the impression of a giant with clay feet.
The alternative to a world in which America guarantees global prosperity and stability within a liberal order is one of increasing conflict, replete with mercantilism, protectionism, and currency wars. Only a multilateral settlement among all major actors can ensure a smoothly working global order - a cause advanced in late 2008, when the technical G20 forum was quickly upgraded to a full summit in charge of global governance. Encompassing all big emerging economies, this appeared to be the most effective way to muster the legitimacy denied to the G7.
But can the G20 deliver on its promise? As the chaos at the climate-change conference in Copenhagen last December demonstrated, both the number of members around the table and the differences between them, do not bode well for the future. The present "currency war" is but another sign of that disorder.
Of course, due to its sheer military might and numerous alliances, the US will remain on top for the foreseeable future. Indeed, while hubris and the crisis have seriously undermined the world's "hyperpower," no multipolar order has emerged to follow America's "unipolar moment."
But military dominance alone is unable to confer authority, as the Afghan quagmire reminds us every day. Having succeeded in integrating the West through prosperity and security following World War II, America must begin to craft a new global leadership structure.
(The author, a former French diplomat, was an associate professor at Sciences Po, Paris. Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2010. www.project-syndicate.org. Shanghai Daily condensed the article.)
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 沪ICP证：沪ICP备05050403号-1
- |
- 互联网新闻信息服务许可证：31120180004
- |
- 网络视听许可证：0909346
- |
- 广播电视节目制作许可证：沪字第354号
- |
- 增值电信业务经营许可证：沪B2-20120012
Copyright © 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
