Home » Opinion » Foreign Views
Europe's economic recovery relies on clean energy
By Connie Hedegaard |
February 21, 2013, Thursday
|
Print Edition
Print Edition
THE need for clean energy has returned to the top of the global economic agenda.
China's new leadership now seems to recognize that the thick, hazardous smog that has come to define Beijing and other cities is more than a pollution problem; it is a result of excessive emphasis on short-term economic planning.
Likewise, in his second inaugural address, US President Barack Obama discussed climate change more than any other issue, saying, "We cannot cede to other nations the technology that will power new jobs and new industries."
At the World Economic Forum in Davos, IMF Managing Director Christine Lagarde and World Bank President Jim Yong Kim surprised business and government leaders with their warnings that genuine economic recovery would be impossible without serious action on climate change.
And, at the most recent EU summit, leaders agreed to commit at least 20 percent of their entire common budget to climate-related spending. These developments suggest that global leaders are finally beginning to understand that, beyond the global economic crisis, the world is experiencing a social and employment crisis, as well as a climate and resource crisis. And none can be resolved without addressing the others.
Moreover, Europe's main commercial competitors have begun to recognize that pursuing short-term development policies, while ignoring long-term threats to the global economy, is a strategic mistake for those who aspire to global leadership in the 21st century.
Although Europeans have known this for decades, in the wake of the recent economic crisis, immediate goals took priority over - and often at the expense of - long-term objectives.
With the EU's economy growing more slowly than those of its major competitors, its leaders must take a more far-sighted approach to restoring - and preserving - its members' growth potential. They must begin by identifying not only what is undermining Europe's competitiveness today, but also those factors that are putting its long-term prospects at risk.
Cost of delayed action
Analysts often point to Europe's costly social-welfare systems, high labor costs, and increasing tax rates as a drag on competitiveness. But other, less widely discussed factors must be considered - particularly the costs of delayed action on climate change.
For example, Unilever CEO Paul Polman reported that extreme weather cost his company US$250-300 million in 2012.
Furthermore, with record-high unemployment rates, Europe needs jobs in dynamic, competitive industries that cannot easily be outsourced. The European Commission has identified the green economy as one of the areas with the highest job-creation potential.
At the same time, Europe's growing dependence on imported fossil fuels is a further hindrance to competitiveness.
Left behind
If Europe does not address these challenges, it risks being left behind. But Europe cannot build an industrial strategy on cheap energy. Unlike the United States and China, which the International Energy Agency estimates possess the world's largest shale-gas deposits, Europe cannot rely on its limited energy reserves to lower prices - especially given that its greater population density makes extraction more difficult.
As a result, Europe will remain a net energy importer. Given rising global demand for oil, particularly in developing countries, energy-import prices will remain high.
Meanwhile, China - the world's leading investor in renewable-energy projects - is undergoing a transformation from the world's low-cost factory to a global leader in green innovation and a major exporter of clean technologies.
In the contest for this global market, Europe cannot compete on price alone. But Europe does have options.
EU leaders can build an economy that is less dependent on imported energy through increased efficiency and greater reliance on domestically produced clean energy.
At the same time, they should tackle other major threats to Europe's long-term competitiveness, including low productivity, an incomplete internal market, and insufficient innovation.
But Europe must not heed short-sighted calls to relax its environmental standards, which some claim harm its competitiveness vis-a-vis countries with looser rules. Given their global reputation as guarantors of quality, Europe's high environmental standards are crucial to its future competitiveness.
Connie Hedegaard is EU Commissioner for Climate Action. Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2013.www.project-syndicate.org. Shanghai Daily condensed the article.
China's new leadership now seems to recognize that the thick, hazardous smog that has come to define Beijing and other cities is more than a pollution problem; it is a result of excessive emphasis on short-term economic planning.
Likewise, in his second inaugural address, US President Barack Obama discussed climate change more than any other issue, saying, "We cannot cede to other nations the technology that will power new jobs and new industries."
At the World Economic Forum in Davos, IMF Managing Director Christine Lagarde and World Bank President Jim Yong Kim surprised business and government leaders with their warnings that genuine economic recovery would be impossible without serious action on climate change.
And, at the most recent EU summit, leaders agreed to commit at least 20 percent of their entire common budget to climate-related spending. These developments suggest that global leaders are finally beginning to understand that, beyond the global economic crisis, the world is experiencing a social and employment crisis, as well as a climate and resource crisis. And none can be resolved without addressing the others.
Moreover, Europe's main commercial competitors have begun to recognize that pursuing short-term development policies, while ignoring long-term threats to the global economy, is a strategic mistake for those who aspire to global leadership in the 21st century.
Although Europeans have known this for decades, in the wake of the recent economic crisis, immediate goals took priority over - and often at the expense of - long-term objectives.
With the EU's economy growing more slowly than those of its major competitors, its leaders must take a more far-sighted approach to restoring - and preserving - its members' growth potential. They must begin by identifying not only what is undermining Europe's competitiveness today, but also those factors that are putting its long-term prospects at risk.
Cost of delayed action
Analysts often point to Europe's costly social-welfare systems, high labor costs, and increasing tax rates as a drag on competitiveness. But other, less widely discussed factors must be considered - particularly the costs of delayed action on climate change.
For example, Unilever CEO Paul Polman reported that extreme weather cost his company US$250-300 million in 2012.
Furthermore, with record-high unemployment rates, Europe needs jobs in dynamic, competitive industries that cannot easily be outsourced. The European Commission has identified the green economy as one of the areas with the highest job-creation potential.
At the same time, Europe's growing dependence on imported fossil fuels is a further hindrance to competitiveness.
Left behind
If Europe does not address these challenges, it risks being left behind. But Europe cannot build an industrial strategy on cheap energy. Unlike the United States and China, which the International Energy Agency estimates possess the world's largest shale-gas deposits, Europe cannot rely on its limited energy reserves to lower prices - especially given that its greater population density makes extraction more difficult.
As a result, Europe will remain a net energy importer. Given rising global demand for oil, particularly in developing countries, energy-import prices will remain high.
Meanwhile, China - the world's leading investor in renewable-energy projects - is undergoing a transformation from the world's low-cost factory to a global leader in green innovation and a major exporter of clean technologies.
In the contest for this global market, Europe cannot compete on price alone. But Europe does have options.
EU leaders can build an economy that is less dependent on imported energy through increased efficiency and greater reliance on domestically produced clean energy.
At the same time, they should tackle other major threats to Europe's long-term competitiveness, including low productivity, an incomplete internal market, and insufficient innovation.
But Europe must not heed short-sighted calls to relax its environmental standards, which some claim harm its competitiveness vis-a-vis countries with looser rules. Given their global reputation as guarantors of quality, Europe's high environmental standards are crucial to its future competitiveness.
Connie Hedegaard is EU Commissioner for Climate Action. Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2013.www.project-syndicate.org. Shanghai Daily condensed the article.
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 沪ICP证：沪ICP备05050403号-1
- |
- 互联网新闻信息服务许可证：31120180004
- |
- 网络视听许可证：0909346
- |
- 广播电视节目制作许可证：沪字第354号
- |
- 增值电信业务经营许可证：沪B2-20120012
Copyright © 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
